Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~Urban <br />@X@Habltat <br /> <br />applies only to desipated affordable housinr units, to what dClree will residents be <br />displaced relative to if the policy applies to only or to both designated and de facto <br />affordable housiRg units currently occupied by low-income famlUes. . <br /> <br />3. Analy2t the human health consequences of a loss of affordable housing and an underproduction <br />of affordable housing for low-, very low- and extremely low-income households, relative to <br />need,. in the TOO Plan. <br />. In this analysis. consider the following questions: To what dearce will households be forced <br />, to spend over 30-10 of their income on housing, accept substandard or overcrowded housing <br />conditions, or move elsewhere to fmd affordable housing? And what are the consequences <br />for their health? <br /> <br />4. Analyze the potential environmental benefits of alternative development scenarios in which more <br />and deeper levels of affordable hoosin, is provided beyond the City's inclusionary zoning <br />policy. <br />· In this analysis, consider the following questions: How doe the current Plan's affordable <br />housing requirements impact air quality, creenhouse gas emissions, and traffic? How could <br />deepening the affordability ofhousina within the TOD affect Vehicle Miles Tra".,led <br />(VMT), air quality, ereenhouse au emissions and traffic? <br /> <br />5. Analyze the '1"00 Plan's impact on the City'sjobslhousin, balance. <br />· In this analysis, consider th~ following questions: How well will the houstnl in the TOO <br />Plan match the needs of the local workforce, particularly those that currently work or will <br />work within the TOO area and within the City? S~ifically; What is the currentjobs-to- <br />hOWling balance within the City? What are the housing needs of the City's current <br />workforce? What will thehouslng needs be of employees in jobs created by the TOO Plan? <br />What are their incomes and what canlwUl they afford? What type. size. and cost housins will <br />be produced under the TOO Plan (and alternatives)? What willlhe resultingjob's housing <br />balance be? And what are the implications of this balance on the transportation needs of low- <br />income. moderate-income Ind high-income employees workin, in the downtown? Sample <br />methods for this analysis can be found in: the 200 I Southern California Al8OClation of <br />Government's report, 1'''- NrN Economy and Job6/HtnI6ing 8aJanc~ in SoutM", Caltfo,."lD <br />II1d JDbs-HoruUrg NUUI A1IIlly8f.r prepared for the City of San Francisco by Keynser- <br />Marsron Apociate$ in 1997.) There is also precedence for this sort of analysis, set forth by <br />NIJf1i1 Clllzms. 26 <br /> <br />Ill. S..UDary of MitiptioRI <br /> <br />2610 Napa CIIIDIU the Califomia Colllt of Appeals reQUi,. ElRi to oOIducttbe fbIIowin&jobIIbousiDa 1IUdy... <br />minimum: 1) identify die DUIl1bw ud type of bousins uaitlI that porIOIII workiIac whbID ... ProjtcI... CIIIl . utlciplltod to <br />requlrw; 2) identIfY Ihe probIbIe 'oadion of thole units; 3) 00II$ld8r wbetber lcIentIf1ed COIIIIIIunitia have IufIIcient bo\aIlnJ <br />units ant sufftciInt Min'iOll to ~ the NIticipIded __ in poplIl'lIioa; aod 4) If it i& ooncluded dull the <br />comrmanl1les lack sufficient UDits lAdIor servioel. 1M E1R IbouId idenIIt Ibat fIl::C Ind cxpIUl1hlt ICtion wD.l ftNd to be <br />tIken lID provide 1hoIe uai&s or Sll'VIces or boIh. Souroo: CoIruDeatI to DEm Wood San:oI Project f\."a.ect b)' the City of <br />o.kI8Ild. Dated Seprember2J.2004 submitted by Jun CaulcOlkl8nd _GIbers onNo\wnbor 15.2004. <br /> <br />436 Ifill SIIeet. Suite UOS1 o..~I~d, CA 946t2 <br />(510) .....10 . '0: (J1~ U9-9610 <br />www.~ <br /> <br />Stl,t ~d <br /> <br />1~1I8'dH ~ <br /> <br />lat966EBIiltS <br /> <br />6S:~t LIilIil~/~t/BIil <br />