Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Agenda No. 07-16 <br /> <br />August 23, 2007 <br />Page 3 of 19 <br /> <br />Tim Hurley began with a review of key points about the TOD Strategy. Instead of just <br />leaving the General Plan to do its job, the TOD Strategy looks further into the future <br />within parameters that lay a policy foundation to facilitate the most responsible growth <br />and development possible while accommodating evolving market trends, economic <br />conditions and housing needs. Its primary guiding principles are smart growth and <br />sustainability, not only parcel by parcel but city-wide. He noted that the Citizen Advisory <br />Committee (CAC) has been a crucial - and "fantastic" - element of the TaD Strategy <br />development, with 27 citizens from various walks of life creating the vision for this plan. <br />The consultants, staff and technical advisers were the implementers of the vision that the <br />CAC came up with. The urgency ordinance that postponed development within the TOD <br />study area was put in place to allow the strategy to develop and to ensure that pipeline <br />projects conform to the direction San Leandro wants to take. Strategy development was <br />funded by Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Alameda County Transportation <br />Improvement Authority grants ($450,000 from MTC and $51,570 from ACTIA), which <br />were awarded to San Leandro in part because of the proximity of the San Leandro BART <br />Station to downtown and the AC Transit Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route planned along <br />East 14th Street. In addition to the 10 CAC meetings over a period of some 18 months, <br />there were three public workshops. Because the TaD Strategy development spanned an <br />election, the former Mayor and former City Council members participated as well as the <br />current Mayor and new Council members. Mr. Hurley described the TOD vision as one <br />that sees downtown as a more vibrant, attractive and connected "destination" with lots of <br />people, lots of retail, and lots of activities and opportunities for things to do and places to <br />shop. The strategy sees the downtown area of the future as having an enhanced image and <br />offering a nicer physical environment, with new architecture, new urban design and <br />landscaping. It would be characterized by higher use of public transportation, greater <br />numbers of retailers and employers, more residents with more housing options, increased <br />safety and security, and additional development opportunities. As Mr. Hurley explained, <br />the TOD Strategy is not a project per se, but a policy framework under which new <br />projects may be undertaken over the next 30 years. <br /> <br />Ted Heyd focused his part of the presentation on the development of the TaD Strategy <br />Environmental Impact Report (EIR). It began with completion of the Draft EIR (DEIR) <br />and the 45-day public review period required by CEQA (the California Environmental <br />Quality Act). Notice of the DEIR's availability at City offices and on the San Leandro <br />website was mailed to previously identified interested parties on June 5, and was <br />published in the Hayward Daily Review on June 9. During the review period (June 5 <br />through July 19), the City received 11 comment letters from agencies, utility providers, <br />local organizations and individuals. In addition, seven comments were made orally at the <br />July 12 public hearing on the DEIR. As Secretary Livermore had indicated earlier, three <br />comments came in after the comment period closed. The Final EIR (FEIR) includes five <br />chapters: <br />1. Introduction - Explaining the purpose of the FEIR, this section discusses the <br />environmental review process, and explains how the FEIR is organized. <br />2. Report Summary - Essentially a reprint from the DEIR, this differs only insofar <br />as it uses underlining to draw attention to text added and strikethrough to indicate <br />deleted text. It covers sections on: A) project under review; B) areas of <br />controversy; C) significant impacts; D) mitigation measures; E) unavoidable <br />