Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Agenda No. 07-16 <br /> <br />August 23, 2007 <br />Page 4 of 19 <br /> <br />significant impacts; F) impacts found not to be significant; G) alternatives; and <br />H) Summary Table. <br />3. Revisions to the DEIR - Referencing the DEIR page by page, this identifies <br />revisions made in the FEIR, again using underlining to indicate new text and <br />strikethrough to indicate deleted text. None of the changes resulted in any new <br />significant impacts; those enumerated in the DEIR remain intact in the FEIR. <br />4. List of Commenting Parties - Lists all commenting parties. <br />5. Responses to Comments - The most substantial component of the FEIR, this <br />section includes responses to all input provided to the DEIR. Comments appear in <br />their entirety, with number codes in the margin keyed to specific responses. <br />Mr. Heyd indicated that input to the DEIR raised concerns in five key areas, and <br />explained how the FEIR generally responds to them: <br />. Provisions in the TOD Strategy area for affordable housing - The TOD Strategy <br />is consistent with San Leandro's Housing Element policies and would support the <br />overall vision of the Housing Element by providing an increased range of housing <br />types to accommodate residents of varied income levels. The City's current <br />Housing Element, which supersedes the TOD Strategy as a vehicle for dictating <br />housing policy within the City, sets forth policies encouraging a mix of unit types <br />priced to accommodate a range of income levels. The City, through completion <br />and implementation of its Housing Element, has consistently upheld the objective <br />of creating a balanced housing supply for all income groups, from very low <br />income to upper income. The TOD Strategy itself, and the General Plan policies <br />that will be adopted as part of the TOD Strategy, confirm the City's commitment <br />to provide for a mix of rental and ownership housing opportunities to <br />accommodate varying income levels. <br />. Displacement of current residents - The reasoning behind these concerns seemed <br />to be that as a result of the strategy build-out, income levels within the strategy <br />area and property values will increase such that moderate- and low-income <br />residents who currently reside in this area will be displaced because they can no <br />longer afford to live there. A variety of housing unit types to accommodate <br />varying income levels will be ensured through General Plan policies 3.01, 3.02 <br />and 3.06, which will be adopted as part of the TOD Strategy. These policies are <br />identified on page 4.9-2 of the DEIR. It is speculative to conclusively state that <br />implementation of the TOD Strategy would price out a certain number of low- <br />income households, regardless of whether they are owner- or renter-occupied. <br />However, as discussed on page 4.9-9 of the DEIR, the potential impact of the <br />physical displacement of all 35 identified existing housing units within the 39 <br />opportunity sites was analyzed. <br />. Exposure of residents to rail noise and emissions (Union Pacific and BART) - <br />The City acknowledges that outside areas such as residential balconies adjacent to <br />the BART tracks may be exposed to noise levels exceeding the City's thresholds. <br />However, it is not believed that substantial long-term hearing loss would occur. <br />First, residents of units that face the BART station would sit on balconies only <br />intermittently; secondly, train pass-bys also are intermittent in nature. The <br />generation of noise from train activity would not be constant, so outdoor <br />balconies would provide for design and amenity options for future development <br />