Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Agenda No. 07-16 <br /> <br />August 23, 2007 <br />Page 14 of 19 <br /> <br />compelling and interesting comments that have been made, and she sees a "wonderful <br />opportunity" to address them in the upcoming update of San Leandro's Housing Element. <br />She said that the TOD Strategy has been a way of looking at how to increase transit <br />ridership in the downtown area by modifying rules and regulations related to density and <br />parking to encourage more housing. The Housing Element looks at how we address <br />housing throughout the City, not just in the downtown area. There are many opportunities <br />in the General Plan and the existing Housing Element for the City to encourage and work <br />with the private sector and nonprofit housing groups to maximize the type of housing <br />needed in the City. Thus, staff has been recommending that these issues come forth in the <br />natural progression in the coming months as work begins on the Housing Element update. <br />She said that she does not believe the TaD Strategy is the appropriate vehicle for this, <br />but rather the imminent Housing Element update. Another issue is BART parking. The <br />lot on the east side of San Leandro Boulevard lends itself most to residential development <br />at this time; it contains approximately 325 parking spaces. The TOD Strategy includes a <br />provi sion to consider - not require - replacement of BART parking on a less-than-I: 1 <br />basis. Staff recommends retaining that language to maximize the opportunities in looking <br />at different parking solutions with development applications that could come forward. If <br />the parking on that 325-space lot were to be replaced on a 75% basis, it would lose a total <br />of 81 parking spaces. She said that Reh- Lin Chen (Senior Transportation Engineer, <br />Engineering and Transportation Department) puIled notes about the number of parking <br />spaces San Leandro stands to gain via the TaD Strategy. Some of the lost parking would <br />be picked up on the Westlake property on the other side of San Leandro Boulevard. On- <br />street parking on a short segment of San Leandro Boulevard could replace 64 of the lost <br />parking spaces. A three-block one-way segment of Hays Street could add another 9 <br />parking places. She added that there are a lot of other opportunities for shared parking; <br />existing employers may be amenable to increase their employees' use of public transit <br />and free up some parking on their properties. <br /> <br />Vice Chair DJugosh asked Commissioner Finberg if her question about SP-l was <br />answered. <br /> <br />Commissioner Finberg said that she is still unclear about the answer. Is it correct that <br />with the current language, any form of development on that property must include <br />second-story residential, but the owner could ask for an exception as a planned <br />development? <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore said that yes, if the owner just wanted to reuse the property as is, at <br />a minimum it would require a use permit and a planned development to do anything other <br />than what the TOD Strategy recommends. <br /> <br />Vice Chair DJugosh said that if Red Mountain wants to use the building as is, at any <br />time after the City Council accepts the EIR, they would be unable to do so. <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore confirmed that they would be unable to do so without a use permit <br />or a planned development application. Even the application that has been put on hold, <br />with the Grocery Outlet, in any case would require a conditional use permit with or <br />without the TOD Strategy's adoption because it is a supermarket greater than 10,000 <br />square feet. <br />