Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Agenda No. 07-16 <br /> <br />August 23, 2007 <br />Page 15 of 19 <br /> <br />Vice Chair Dlugosh said then that it could be used, with a use permit, as it exists now. <br />But at such time that the property is redeveloped, it would have to fall within the TOD <br />Strategy guidelines. <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore clarified that with the adoption of the TOD Strategy, it would have <br />to be ground-floor retail and residential above. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nardine asked if a process would be put in place to ensure that the <br />Plam1ing Commission could come back and review the TOD Strategy every couple of <br />years in light of changes in economics, the market and demographics. Will there be a <br />review process? <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore said that TOD Strategy does not establish a review process per se, <br />but neither does it preclude other initiatives. The Planning Commission and City Council <br />can always look at additional ways of changing regulations to meet changing <br />circumstances. <br /> <br />Commissioner Finberg asked whether the Planning Commission IS able to make <br />changes in the staff recommendations to forward to the City Council. <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore said yes, certainly. <br /> <br />Commissioner Finberg said that she is not comfortable with the SP-l verbiage, but is <br />not at the moment prepared to say exactly how it should change. She also referred to <br />some of Commissioner Collier's concems - BART parking, bike lanes - and is not sure <br />how to verbalize on the spot appropriate changes to those sections. She understands the <br />need to move forward because the moratorium on downtown development is due to <br />expire on November 6, but she repeated that she is uncomfortable doing so without some <br />"tweaks" in the current documents. <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore clarified the situation about the moratorium. She confirmed that it <br />is now set to expire on November 6. If City Council has a first reading on September 4 <br />and a second reading on September 17, new zoning regulations would take effect in mid- <br />October (30 days later). If the Planning Commission does not make a recommendation <br />tonight, it would be necessary to extend the moratorium; otherwise, no replacement <br />zoning would be in effect when the moratorium expires. <br /> <br />Commissioner Abero asked how long the existing zoning would have to be extended if <br />further changes were to miss the November 6 moratorium expiration. She wondered if it <br />is a matter of weeks, months or years? <br /> <br />Assistant City Attorney Stuart said that by statute, the moratorium could be extended <br />only for a certain period of time. She believes it has already been extended once, and a <br />moratorium cannot by Califomia law be in place for a period of years. She said it would <br />be necessary to check where we are within that statutory time period. If anything, she <br />said, this would be a matter of months, certainly not years. <br /> <br />Chair Reed, acknowledging that the TOD Strategy represents a plan for the long-term <br />future and it contains some good thought that will set the City's direction, recognized <br />some hesitation among Commissioners. He is not sure it is necessary to rush to judgment, <br />but also does not want to procrastinate. He suggested that perhaps a short extension to the <br />moratorium is appropriate. <br />