Laserfiche WebLink
7. The conversion would be phased at approximately 15-20 units per phase. The first phase <br />would likely start at Building A in front and move to Building B at the rear. Depending <br />upon the residents' demand and the market conditions it was estimated that the <br />conversion could range between one to two years. <br />8. The applicant would explore improving the refuse areas in reply to residents' comments <br />that the dumpsters provided did not seem adequate. <br />9. Although, a noise study has been completed showing adequate insulation is provided <br />between the units, the applicant would have re-evaluated if any more sound transmission <br />control measures would be necessary between the units. This was in reply to residents' <br />comments about noise from adjacent units. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />As this is a work session item, no action is required of the Planning Commission. Staff and the <br />applicant are asking for direction from the Planning Commission on the following: <br />1. Reduction of the existing front landscaping to provide the required additional parking. <br />(The existing front setback is between 10 to 15 feet in width from the Haas Avenue right- <br />of-way line. Under this proposal it would be reduced to five feet in width). <br />2. Consideration of frontage improvements facing Haas Avenue (i.e., low walls, arbor/trellis <br />features, specimen-size tree planting and new shrub and ground cover planting) to <br />mitigaxe loss of landscaped setback and the increase of paving and parking area.) <br />', 3. Increasing the ratio of compact parking spaces to standard sized parking spaces. <br />(Typically a maximum of 35% compact spaces are permitted; the proposal is for 44% of <br />the parking spaces to be compact size). <br />4. Exception to provide less laundry facilities than required by the conversion ordinance. <br />5. Retention of the mature redwood trees on the property. <br />If the use permit with the reduction in front setback and the reduction of laundry facilities are to <br />be considered, staff recommends that these items be covered under a concurrent application to <br />modify the existing planned development. This would streamline the review process before the <br />Planning Commission and City Council. <br />ATTACIiMENTS <br />Vicinity Map <br />Applicant's Supporting Statement <br />Notification to Tenants with Conversion Ordinance <br />Open Space Calculations <br />Exhibit A -Woodside Condominiums Vesting Tentative Map (Sheet 1 of 3, Site Plan, Reduced <br />Photographs of Existing Conditions) <br />Exhibit B -Woodside Condominiums, Depressed Parking Layout, Parking Count Tables, Floor <br />Flans, and Unit Mixture Table (Sheet 2 of 3) <br />Exhibit C -Woodside Condominiums Enlarged Partial Site Plan Showing Parking Redesign <br />(Sheet 3 of 3) <br />~ Planning Commission Staff Report <br />January 11, 2007 <br />