My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2008 0729
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2008 0729
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 10:13:54 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:13:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
7/29/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2008 0902
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2008\Packet 2008 0902
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because referrals from peer agencies are not reliably tracked, it's impossible to say to <br />what degree these referrals manifest in Center usage, to analyze which peer agencies are <br />referring to DSFRC, or to identify which services are most needed by referred clients - <br />all of which would be useful information. There is no compelling reason, as it pertains to <br />sustainability, to track referrals from peer agencies except as a very indirect measurement <br />of the peer agencies' familiarity with and support of DSFRC. However, tracking these <br />referrals could easily be made part of the initial client interview by making that question <br />a required-input field on the intake form. <br />Board of Directors <br />Board of Directors -Survey Results: Summary <br />We also wanted to survey the Board of Directors for DSFRC to get their impressions of <br />the quality of service provided, their own roles as board members, and opinions about <br />management. <br />Out of the 14 Board members, 10 responded to our survey request, 3 did not submit a <br />response, and 1 opted out because she was newly appointed and had no DSFRC Board <br />experience. Board members' exact comments can be found in Appendix E: Summar~of <br />Board of Directors' Feedback. <br />Eleven key questions were asked. Each question is given below followed by a brief <br />summary of the responses. <br />How would you describe DSFRC's mission and the services they offer? <br />All of the respondents knew DSFRC's mission -some more completely than <br />others. <br />What is your impression of DSFRC in the area of quality of services provided to the <br />community? <br />Most of the Board responded directly to this question, though several did not <br />comment on quality (choosing instead of make other statements about mission, <br />using adjectives such as "unique", or commenting on community reputation). Of <br />those that commented on "quality", all found the services offered to be of <br />excellent quality. Only one respondent recognized, accurately, that several <br />programs were struggling and others were doing very well -though they did not <br />equate this with the concept of "quality" (a program can be operating at a loss and <br />still provide quality service, for example). <br />What is your impression of DSFRC in the area of management and staff (skills, <br />dedication, etc)? <br />All Board members directly, or indirectly, described management and staff as <br />dedicated. Many commented on them as being skilled. One member pointed out <br />Sustaioabiliry Study: Davis Street Family Resource Center-4/08 Page 21 of 96 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.