Minutes 1999 1115 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minutes -City of San Leandro City Council and Page 12 San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting -November 15, 1999 D. Resolution No. 99-165, Resolution Approving Amendment No. 1 to Contractual Services Agreement with Barry J. Miller, AICP, Relating to Preparing Additional General Plan Elements Beyond Land Use and Circulation Elements and Preparation of Associated Environmental Documentation (amends the contractual services agreement that provides for additional services from a project team headed by Barry J. Miller to prepare the Open Space conservation, Safety and Noise Elements of the General Plan in addition to the Land Use and Circulation Elements and Preparation of Associated Environmental Documentation; budgeted for 1999-2000). Cost: $100,000 (budgeted for 1999-2000) (2323) E. Resolution Approving Final Subdivision Map, Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Public Improvements), Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Private Improvements), and Acceptance of Dedication of Public Utility Easement and Public Right-of--Way for Tract 7093; Medallion, Phase I, Adjacent to 701 Fremont Avenue; Developer: Ryland Homes of California, Inc. (provides for the development of twenty-three [23], single-family dwellings on a 2.2-acre vacant lot adjacent to 701 Fremont Avenue). Removed from the Consent Calendar to New Business. 7. NEW BUSINESS Items Removed from the Consent Calendar: 6.E Resolution Approving Final Subdivision Map, Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Public Improvements), Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Private Improvements), and Acceptance of Dedication of Public Utility Easement and Public Right-of--Way for Tract 7093; Medallion, Phase I, Adjacent to 701 Fremont Avenue; Developer: Ryland Homes of California, Inc. (provides for the development of twenty-three [23], single- family dwellings on a 2.2-acre vacant lot adjacent to 701 Fremont Avenue). M/5/C to approve Item 6.E: Ayes: Grant, Loeffler, and Young (3); Noes: Lothrop and Glaze (2) The City Attorney noted that, given the vote of 3-2, the matter would not be carried, as four (4) affirmative votes are required to carry a Motion. He further noted that, if this item is deferred to the next City Council Meeting, it will be deemed approved by operational law. He explained that a Final Map is a "ministerial act;" and, if it is not approved within the first, regularly agendized meeting, it is deemed approved by operation of law. The City Attorney explained it would be better for the City Council to vote affirmatively to approve the Tentative Map or to vote negatively on it.