Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes -City of San Leandro City Council Meeting <br />August 17, 1998 <br />Page 8 <br />Council Member Nazdine stressed the need to look towazd privatization and the <br />need to look at excluding the Seagate residents from paying taxes for services they <br />aze not receiving. She also would support curbside pick-up with exemptions. She <br />suggested that if someone needed special attention, such as backyard pickup, there <br />could be some sort of mark made on the curb or something similar, indicating their <br />need for the special service. She also would like staff to look into discounts for <br />low- and fixed-income individuals; and she stressed the need for the City's garbage <br />and recycling equipment to be looked at -especially if the recycling machine <br />leaves oil spots after going through. <br />Council Member Lothrop stated she has gotten a number of phone calls from both <br />sides of the issue. She feels there is a need to look at the process the City has to <br />pay for things in our community. She likes the idea of looking at low-income/ <br />fared-income discounts. She added that there is a need to keep the maintenance of <br />sewers a concern when looking at the privatization of sewer service. She clarified <br />with staff that there is no increase being proposed this evening for the storm water <br />run-off fee. With regard to the residents at Seagate, she stated the City could do <br />an annual debris pick-up if the residents are so inclined, and there should be some <br />way to provide other services if they wish. <br />Vice Mayor Galvan commented on the cost to provide the services, which keeps <br />going up, along with the salary adjustments to provide the service. He <br />commended staff for holding the line on the other fees. He has been for <br />privatization of services for the last four years. He further indicated there are two <br />elements to the sewer system -the collection system and the treatment plant. <br />There is also a need to maintain the infrastructure. He doesn't want to see current <br />efforts curtailed; he would like us to be proactive. Perhaps there are things that <br />can be scaled back. <br />Council Member Loeffier questioned if the City had followed the appropriate <br />process spelled out by Proposition 218. The City Attorney explained the <br />procedures the City followed and stated they did comply with Proposition 218 <br />requirements. Council Member Loeffier continued by stating perhaps the City <br />should have sent the notice by 1 ~ Class Mail and not by Bulk Mail. He added that <br />there should be a serious look taken at the Enterprise Funds by a citizen <br />committee, which should have representation from business people, as well. <br />The Mayor indicated that, with what she has heard, the citizens' committee should <br />review the following: <br />Rates/privatization of services/ Enterprise Funds <br />Discounts for low- and/or fared-income individuals/families <br />Service options for gated commwuties/s~gested alternatives <br />Curbside pick-up with ability for exemptions <br />There was Council consensus for support for the above. <br />