Laserfiche WebLink
b. Does the project have impacts that are X 3, 4, 9, 15 <br />individually limited, but cumulatively <br />considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" <br />means the incremental effects of a project that <br />are considerable when viewed in connection <br />with the effects of the past projects, the effects <br />of other current projects, and the effects of <br />probable futureprojects.) <br />C. Does the project have environmental effects X <br />which will cause substantial adverse effects on 10, 11,12 <br />human beings, either directly or indirectly? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a) As discussed under Section IV, Biological Resources, a Tree Report prepared by Hortscience (October, 2008) <br />identified all trees on the subject property over six inches in diameter. Forty-seven trees were surveyed on the site, <br />representing five species, including Holly Oak (23), Sweet Gum (18), Camphor (4) and Tree of Heaven (1) and <br />Honey Locust (] ). Twenty two (22) of the Holly Oaks along San Leandro Boulevard and four (4) of the interior trees <br />will be impacted by the proposed project. The tree report recommended the removal of up to thirty (3 0) trees. The <br />site plan will allow for preservation of up to seventeen trees, including seven of the Sweet Gums along W. Juana <br />Avenue, nine of the Sweet Gums along Carpentier Street and one Tree of Heaven. The project would not likely affect <br />any sensitive species or habitat on Site 1 or 2, However, mature trees on both sites may provide habitat for nesting birds <br />typically found in urban settings. It is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, per <br />the California Fish and Game Code (Section 3503). Removal of trees currently on either site during nesting season <br />could affect these birds. The applicant shall conduct pre -construction surveys for the presence of nesting birds within <br />each of the project sites. The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre -construction breeding - <br />season survey (approximately February 1 through August 31) to determine if any birds are nesting on or directly <br />adjacent to the project area. The survey shall be conducted during the same calendar year that construction is planned to <br />begin. If no nesting birds are found, then no further action would be required. The project will not affect historical and <br />architectural resources, and the potential for discovering pre-bistorie cultural resources is low. <br />b) Impacts that are individually limited but can be cumulatively considerable include impacts related to aesthetics, air <br />quality, biology, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology I water quality, noise, <br />population and housing, public services, transportation/circulation, recreation, and utilities and service systems. <br />Mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce these impacts to a level of less than significant. c) As discussed <br />in Section 3, Geology and Soils, and in Section 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Phase I and Phase II Environmental <br />Assessments were conducted for the proposed project that identified remediation methods and mitigation measures to <br />avoid substantial, adverse impacts to human beings resulting from seismic induced ground failure, including <br />liquefaction, as well as potentially significant hazards to the public or the environment. Section 5, Air Quality, notes <br />that the proposed project could introduce regional and localized air emissions through construction and long-term <br />operational activities. Section 10, Transportation / Circulation notes that traffic generated by the project would <br />exacerbate the already unacceptable levels of service at the intersection of San Leandro Boulevard and Parrott Street. <br />Given these impacts, the project may have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human <br />beings either directly or indirectly that require mitigation to reduce them to a level of less than significant. <br />Inclusion of mitigation measures will reduce all significant impacts to a less than significant level_ <br />Cornerstone at San Leandro Crossings Initial Study 30 March 2009 <br />POTENTIALLY <br />ISSUES <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN <br />NO <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />IMPACT <br />SOURCES <br />ISSUES <br />MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />INCORPORATED <br />b. Does the project have impacts that are X 3, 4, 9, 15 <br />individually limited, but cumulatively <br />considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" <br />means the incremental effects of a project that <br />are considerable when viewed in connection <br />with the effects of the past projects, the effects <br />of other current projects, and the effects of <br />probable futureprojects.) <br />C. Does the project have environmental effects X <br />which will cause substantial adverse effects on 10, 11,12 <br />human beings, either directly or indirectly? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a) As discussed under Section IV, Biological Resources, a Tree Report prepared by Hortscience (October, 2008) <br />identified all trees on the subject property over six inches in diameter. Forty-seven trees were surveyed on the site, <br />representing five species, including Holly Oak (23), Sweet Gum (18), Camphor (4) and Tree of Heaven (1) and <br />Honey Locust (] ). Twenty two (22) of the Holly Oaks along San Leandro Boulevard and four (4) of the interior trees <br />will be impacted by the proposed project. The tree report recommended the removal of up to thirty (3 0) trees. The <br />site plan will allow for preservation of up to seventeen trees, including seven of the Sweet Gums along W. Juana <br />Avenue, nine of the Sweet Gums along Carpentier Street and one Tree of Heaven. The project would not likely affect <br />any sensitive species or habitat on Site 1 or 2, However, mature trees on both sites may provide habitat for nesting birds <br />typically found in urban settings. It is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, per <br />the California Fish and Game Code (Section 3503). Removal of trees currently on either site during nesting season <br />could affect these birds. The applicant shall conduct pre -construction surveys for the presence of nesting birds within <br />each of the project sites. The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre -construction breeding - <br />season survey (approximately February 1 through August 31) to determine if any birds are nesting on or directly <br />adjacent to the project area. The survey shall be conducted during the same calendar year that construction is planned to <br />begin. If no nesting birds are found, then no further action would be required. The project will not affect historical and <br />architectural resources, and the potential for discovering pre-bistorie cultural resources is low. <br />b) Impacts that are individually limited but can be cumulatively considerable include impacts related to aesthetics, air <br />quality, biology, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology I water quality, noise, <br />population and housing, public services, transportation/circulation, recreation, and utilities and service systems. <br />Mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce these impacts to a level of less than significant. c) As discussed <br />in Section 3, Geology and Soils, and in Section 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Phase I and Phase II Environmental <br />Assessments were conducted for the proposed project that identified remediation methods and mitigation measures to <br />avoid substantial, adverse impacts to human beings resulting from seismic induced ground failure, including <br />liquefaction, as well as potentially significant hazards to the public or the environment. Section 5, Air Quality, notes <br />that the proposed project could introduce regional and localized air emissions through construction and long-term <br />operational activities. Section 10, Transportation / Circulation notes that traffic generated by the project would <br />exacerbate the already unacceptable levels of service at the intersection of San Leandro Boulevard and Parrott Street. <br />Given these impacts, the project may have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human <br />beings either directly or indirectly that require mitigation to reduce them to a level of less than significant. <br />Inclusion of mitigation measures will reduce all significant impacts to a less than significant level_ <br />Cornerstone at San Leandro Crossings Initial Study 30 March 2009 <br />