Laserfiche WebLink
herbicide as one of many possible treatment methods was initially reviewed and approved <br />by the Conservancy on September 25, 2003 (see staff recommendation attached as <br />Exhibit 1), in connection with the initial ISP Control Program authorization and <br />Conservancy certification of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact <br />StatemenUEnvironmental Impact Report, San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina <br />Project: Spartina Control Program ("FEIS/EIIZ"). By Addendum to the FEIS/EIR, <br />reviewed by the Conservancy at its June 16, 2005 meeting (see staff recommendation <br />attached to Exhibit 2), the Conservancy approved a revision to the ISP Control Program, <br />allowing the use of a newly registered aquatic herbicide, imazapyr (and associated <br />surfactants and colorants), which is more effective and has even less potential effect on <br />the environment than the previously approved herbicide, glyphosate. <br />As discussed in detail in the "COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA" section, below, there are no <br />potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the treatment of the newly <br />infested sites on the shores of the San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge and the Napa <br />River that were not considered in the certified FEIS/EIR. All mitigation measures <br />identified in the FEIS/EIR, which will reduce potentially significant impacts to less than <br />significant, will be carried out before, during and after treatment. (See Exhibit 6: the site- <br />specific "Invasive Spartina Control Plan for North San Pablo. Bay", and Exhibit 7: <br />"Environmental Documentation: North San Pablo Bay Invasive Mitigation Matrix", <br />outlining site conditions and activities, potential impacts and required mitigation). <br />PROJECT FINANCING: <br />A. Financing for this Authorization: <br />Coastal Conservancy $1,972,190 <br />WCB grant to the Coastal Conservancy $249,425 <br />Treatment Grantees' Contributions $ 116,000 <br />Total $2,337,615 <br />Conservancy funding for the treatment and eradication activities and ongoing <br />management of ISP is expected to come from the fiscal year 2005!06 appropriation to the <br />Conservancy from the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal Beach Protection <br />Fund of 2002 (Proposition 50). Proposition 50 authorizes the use of these funds for the <br />purpose of protecting coastal watersheds through projects to restore land and water <br />resources. Funds may be used for planning and permitting associated with restoration, as <br />well as the restoration activities. (Water Code Section 79570). The use of Proposition 50 <br />funds for treatment activities and the ongoing environmental consulting services needed <br />to operate and manage the Spartina Control Program will accomplish these purposes. <br />The consulting services are needed specifically to plan, coordinate and obtain <br />environmental permits and approvals for the ISP Control Program, which will allow for <br />the restoration of the coastal watershed and associated wetlands affected by invasive <br />,~>;,,. <br />~~~~~`~~ <br />