My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agmt 2008 California State Coastal Conservancy
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agreements
>
2008
>
Agmt 2008 California State Coastal Conservancy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2009 3:22:53 PM
Creation date
7/20/2009 3:22:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agreement
Document Date (6)
5/29/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Agmt 2006 State Coastal Conservancy
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agreements\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
activities, if applicable, including a schedule and budget, and evidence that the <br />grantee has obtained all necessary permits and approvals for the project. <br />In carrying out any treatment and eradication project, the grantee shall comply <br />with all applicable mitigation and monitoring measures that are set forth in the <br />approved site-specific plan, that are required by any permit, the amended <br />Biological Opinion or approval for the project, and that are identified in the "Final <br />Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, <br />San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project: Spartina Control Program" <br />(FEIS/R), adopted by the Conservancy on September 25, 2003. <br />3. Disbursement of up to $1,749,038 (one million seven hundred forty-nine thousand <br />thirty-eight dollars) of Conservancy funding for ongoing environmental consulting <br />services needed to operate and manage the ISP Control Program on an accelerated <br />schedule through spring of 2010." <br />Staff further recommends that the- Conservancy adopt the following findings: <br />"Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal <br />Conservancy hereby finds that: <br />1. Disbursement of additional funds for the ISP Control Program treatment and <br />eradication projects, and ongoing management, is consistent with Public Resources <br />Code Sections 31160-31165 and with the resolutions, finding and discussion <br />accompanying the Conservancy authorizations of September 25, 2003 and June 16, <br />2005, as shown in the staff recommendations attached as Exhibits 1 and 2 to this staff <br />recommendation. <br />2. The proposed authorization is consistent with the Project Selection Criteria and <br />Guidelines last updated by the Conservancy on September 20, 2007. <br />3. The California Wildlife Foundation and Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed <br />are private nonprofit organizations existing under Section 501(c)(3) of the United <br />States Internal Revenue Code, whose purposes are consistent with Division 21 of the <br />California Public Resources Code. <br />4. On June 16, 2005 -the Conservancy authorized initial funding for the 2005 and 2006 <br />ISP Control Program treatment and eradication projects at 22 different sites (the <br />original treatment projects), under site-specific plans for each site, and made <br />appropriate findings under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This <br />authorization provides for additional funding for those same 22 original treatment <br />projects. The nature, duration and extent of the original treatment projects, including <br />environmental effects and proposed mitigation measures, was fully described and <br />considered by the Conservancy in connection with the initial funding authorizations <br />and have not changed, other than by extending the same (or less extensive) work into <br />2008 (See Exhibit 8). Disbursement of additional funds for the original treatment <br />projects is, thus, consistent with the previous CEQA finding: that the environmental <br />effects associated with the proposed original treatment projects and the mitigation <br />measures needed to reduce or avoid those effects were fully identified and considered <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.