My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes 1997 1020
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1997
>
Minutes 1997 1020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 11:07:09 AM
Creation date
7/29/2009 11:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minutes
Document Date (6)
10/20/1997
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
back to my original point, we've got......there are three parts to this process. We can <br />be here all night if you want to talk about specifically what we want on Lewelling and <br />my point is, we don't have to decide that this evening. All we have to do is say that the <br />scope of what we want on Lewelling is something that this City Council is going to take <br />a look at and decide as part of the EIR process -exactly what we want to see happen <br />there. <br />Mayor Corbett: Thank you Gordon. I want to call on Garry and Julian, but I have a <br />suggestion. And, let me just throw this out. Clearly, I think one of the most difficult <br />parts of being the representative on the EBDA Board is trying to represent a position that <br />was taken many, many years ago and match it to what is new today. There's no doubt <br />about that that is a problem - that's an issue. Council Member Glaze, I know, has a list <br />of mitigations, specifically, that he's interested in seeing put forth to deal with the issues <br />on Lewelling Boulevard and to make sure that the neighborhood is not unduly disrupted <br />and we get our fair share out of this deal and all that sort of thing. So, I think that what <br />we want to make sure tonight is that any vote that is taken on this agreement -any vote <br />that is taken will not jeopardize our ability to get mitigation. Would that be a correct <br />statement Council Member Glaze? <br />Council Member Glaze: That would be correct and then the problem is the City <br />Attorney is kind of echoed what my concern is - is that we go on record at some point <br />in time. And, my only problem with this is we saw this and the comment to comment <br />tonight on this on Thursday. So, we're here tonight, you know, talking about this. You <br />Qctober 20, 1997 -Verbatim Transcript, Item 6.A 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.