My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes 1997 1020
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1997
>
Minutes 1997 1020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 11:07:09 AM
Creation date
7/29/2009 11:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minutes
Document Date (6)
10/20/1997
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sanitary District can proceed with a project by themselves and they are prepared to do <br />that. So, there will be a project. Dublin-San Ramon -they are committed to doing a <br />project. <br />Mayor Corbett: Now, can I say something? And, I want to hear what Julian and Garry <br />have to say also, but if I could just throw this out here. Let me just ask the City <br />Manager a question. Mr. City Manager, and I'm going to ask the Council a question, <br />is there enough time to have asub-committee of the Council, consisting of Council <br />Member Galvan and Council Member Glaze, to get together prior to our first meeting <br />in November -have them have an opportunity to sit down and talk about the various <br />mitigation issues and I know what the City Attorney has just said -that it's a separate <br />issue beyond this agreement. But, I believe that asub-committee of the Council, <br />meaning Bab and Gordon, should meet before it comes back to the Council, before it has <br />to go back to EBDA, to make sure all the "I"s are dotted and the "T"s are crossed. And <br />then I also have to ask, if the Council is acceptable to that process. <br />Council Member Glaze: Yeah, if we can make it -and I'm basing this on what I have <br />been listening to from the City Attorney tonight - is that if the City Attorney can assure <br />me that this agreement that we pass tonight, if we can go ahead with this and develop <br />a separate list of mitigations that we can sit down and go forward with to LAVWMA, <br />without jeopardizing losing it - I'm willing to pass this tonight with us going with a <br />separate mitigation plan to LAVWMA. If that is possible, without us jeopardizing it, <br />then I have no problem. <br />October 20, 1997 -Verbatim Transcript, Item 6.A 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.