My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2004-037
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2004
>
Reso 2004-037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2009 11:34:01 AM
Creation date
8/7/2009 12:55:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
4/12/2004
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
POTENTIALLY <br />ISSUES POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO <br /> SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED <br />f. For a project within the vicinity of a private X <br />airstrip, would the project expose people <br />residing or working in the project area to <br />excessive noise levels? <br />EXPLANATION: The East 14 Street Corridor is within the 65db1 noise band as shown in the General Plan. New development <br />proposals that result after the Development Strategy is adopted will be required to undergo separate environmental review <br />and if <br />, <br />appropriate, devise mitigation measure to address any noise impacts. The Development Strategy is a policy document and is not a <br />physical develaplnent proposal and will not generate any impacts related to noise. <br />Source: San Leandro Genera Plan, Cahpter° 6, Environmental Hazards -Noise Page 6-16,• Draft; East 14`r' Sheet Development <br />Strategy <br />i0. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would t he ro'ect: <br />a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial <br />in relation to the existing traffic load and <br />capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a X <br />substantial increase in either the number of <br />vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on <br />roads, or con estion at intersections ? <br />b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a <br />level of service standard established by the X <br />county congestion management agency for <br />desi ted roads or highwa s? <br />c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns <br />, <br />Including either an increase in traffic levels or <br />~ <br />X <br />a change in location that results in substantial <br />safe risks? <br />d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design <br />feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous <br />X <br />intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm <br />e ui ment 7 <br />e. Result in inadequate emergency access? <br /> <br />f <br />Result in inad <br />t <br />l <br />i X <br />. <br />e ua <br />e ar <br />c <br />n ca aci ? X <br />g. Conflict with adopted pokicies, plans, or <br />Programs supporting alternative transportation X <br />(e. ., bus turnouts, bic cle racks ? <br />h <br />Tri <br />er CMA R <br />i <br />? <br />GP <br />. <br />gg <br />ev <br />ew <br />( <br />A involving more <br />than k00 p.m. peak hour trips generated over X <br />existin GP <br />East 14`r' Street South Area Development Strategy 10 December 19, 1003 <br />Initial Sludy and Negative Declaration <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.