My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
FacilitiesTransportation Highlights 2010 0309
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Facilities & Transportation Committee
>
FacilitiesTransportation Highlights 2010 0309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2010 4:25:02 PM
Creation date
4/1/2010 4:25:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
3/9/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0405
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0405
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Facilities Committee Meeting Minutes <br />Page 4 <br />March 9, 2010 <br />Committee Recommendations: <br />The Committee recommends that the City Council schedule approval of the Marina <br />Boulevard Interchange Impact Fee to help fund improvements to the interchange. <br />3. Discussion Regarding Treatment Plant Condition Report <br />Mike Bakaldin provided an overview of the Treatment Plant Rehabilitation project and <br />provided the Committee with more information from a study that was presented in 2009 <br />to both the Committee and at a Work Session. Public Works' presentation aimed at <br />providing a brief description of each section of the project and reasons why we need to <br />move forward now and why it is in the best interest of the City. <br />Uche provided a historical overview of the sewer system. Prior to 1995, only $ l OOK was <br />spent to maintain the plant. A study was done on the collection system to quantify the <br />problem. Results showed that the system was not in good condition. A total of $20M <br />was used to fix/maintain the system so far. A comprehensive analysis of the system was <br />performed to determine what needs to be done quickly to avoid catastrophic failure, <br />which will be presented next by Dean Wilson. <br />Dean gave a presentation on the different aspects of repair to the treatment plant. He <br />indicated that the treatment plant was the second in the Bay Area, and the first in the state <br />to meet "fully treated" requirements. The plant operates 24x7, 365 days a year. The <br />plant is self-sufficient and does not use General Funds to operate. Since it was built in <br />the 1930s, the structures, units and equipment are old and have reached the end of their <br />useful lives. He showed the existing conditions and the proposed rehabilitation. <br />In 2002, Council agreed to own and operate the plant. At the time, $38M was identified <br />for collection system improvements. So far, $20M has been spent to make <br />repairs/improvements. Collection system staff doubled due to additional attention to <br />preventative maintenance and sanitary sewer management and storm water programs, <br />both of which are now mandated. There are 12 major project elements of the WPCP <br />Rehabilitation Project; with the first six critical and must be done right away. Wet <br />weather storage is mandated by 2011. With improvements, we will have the required <br />capacity. Concrete in many areas need to be replaced. Secondary treatment has also <br />reached its end of life. Seismically, it will not hold up. The existing electrical system has <br />been around since 1958, and is old. The current transformer is a safety hazard and is <br />susceptible to power surges. The primary clarifiers are old; built in 1938 and 1947. The <br />Digesters need concrete repair and coating and the steel roof needs insulating. Basically, <br />the structures, units and equipment are old and require replacement in order to avoid high <br />risks. The City needs to avoid doing things on an emergency basis; there is a need to <br />move forward now because the most critical facility is the most likely to fail. We need to <br />go forward with replacing wet weather storage. We want to position ourselves to be on <br />the list for SRF funding, which requires approval from Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.