My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2010 0503
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
Packet 2010 0503
>
3A Public Hearing 2010 0503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2019 8:23:39 AM
Creation date
4/29/2010 11:35:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/3/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0503
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0503
Reso 2010-043
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
Reso 2010-044
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to provide two left -turn lanes, one through lane and one shared -through -right lane on <br />the southbound approach (as well as bike lanes in both directions in accordance with <br />the San Leandro Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan). With such widening, the <br />southbound left -turn queue could be accommodated within the storage capacity of the <br />two left turn lanes, and upstream traffic operations along Merced Street would not be <br />adversely affected. The mitigation measure requires the project sponsors to contribute <br />fair -share funds towards this improvement. (MM TR -1.2) <br />The left -turn lane required for the new signalized driveway along Marina Boulevard could <br />encroach into Caltrans right-of-way. It is uncertain if an encroachment permit can be acquired, <br />and therefore the City cannot guarantee that this mitigation measure will be fully implemented. <br />As such, impacts to the Marina Boulevard/Merced Street intersection would be significant and <br />unavoidable. <br />Additionally, widening Merced Street would require the acquisition of additional right-of-way. <br />Acquiring this additional right-of-way cannot be guaranteed due to the presence and potential <br />impacts to existing businesses along Merced Street. As such, impacts to the Republic Avenue/ <br />Merced Street intersection would be significant and unavoidable. <br />Traffic Impacts - Cumulative (2035) plus Phase 1 plus Mixed Use Retail Development <br />When added to projected cumulative traffic levels by year 2035, traffic associated with <br />development of Phase 1 of the Kaiser Medical Center together with traffic from the mixed-use <br />retail development would cause several intersections to degrade to substandard levels of service. <br />Mitigation: In addition to the improvements identified in MM TR -1.1 through MM <br />TR -1.3 above, there is additional mitigation needed to address the contribution to <br />cumulative traffic impacts associated with Phase 1 of the Kaiser Medical Center <br />together with traffic from the mixed-use retail development. <br />The following table provides a summary of the affected intersections, the mitigation measures <br />required, and a conclusion as to whether these measures can be implemented by the City to <br />reduce traffic impacts. <br />Intersection - Mitigation Measure Limits on Implementation' <br />Location <br />Davis Street/ Mitigation of this traffic impact requires the westbound lanes to <br />Implementation of this <br />Doolittle Drive be re -striped to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and <br />mitigation measure would <br />two right -turn lanes. The mitigation measure requires the project <br />require an encroachment <br />sponsors to contribute fair -share funds towards this <br />permit from Caltrans. <br />' The use of italics font under the column "Limits on Implementation" indicates that the recommended <br />mitigation measures may not be feasible due to required right-of-way acquisition and/or obtaining permits from <br />other agencies, such that the impact may remain significant and unavoidable. If these limitations on implementation <br />can be overcome (i.e., should right-of-way acquisition be found to be feasible or if permits can be obtained from <br />other agencies), these mitigation measures would be capable of reducing impacts to levels of less than significant. <br />Planning Commission Staff Report April 22, 2010 <br />Kaiser Permanente San Leandro Medical Center and Mixed Use Retail Development Project <br />Page 10 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.