3A Public Hearing 2010 0503 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

secondary impacts and can be accommodated by reducing the bike lane and sidewalk right-of-way and reconfiguring the channeling island. h. Parking: (1) Impact TR -6 finds that under Baseline plus Kaiser Medical Center Phase 1 plus Mixed -Use Retail Development conditions, it is unknown if the Mixed -Use Retail Development portion of the project would provide sufficient onsite parking spaces to meet the projected parking demand. This impact is reduced by Mitigation Measure TR -6.1, which requires the project applicants for the Mixed -Use Retail Development to prepare a parking demand study and provide sufficient parking as specified by the study. (2) Impact TR -18 finds that under Cumulative plus Kaiser Medical Center Build - Out plus Mixed -Use Retail Development conditions, the project may not provide sufficient on-site parking spaces to meet the projected parking demand. This impact is reduced by Mitigation Measure TR -18.1, which requires the project applicant for the Kaiser Medical Center to prepare a parking demand study prior to build -out and to provide sufficient parking as specified by the study. Utilities: Impact UT -4 finds that the proposed project's increased demand for the treatment of wastewater could be met with existing treatment facilities, but the increase in wastewater flow may require new or expanded sewer lines. This impact is reduced by Mitigation Measure UT -4.1, which requires the project sponsor(s) to work with the City of San Leandro to conduct a capacity impact analysis of the sewer lines which connect the project site to the Marina Boulevard sewer line and pay a fair share contribution to any capacity improvements required to accommodate the projected wastewater. SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS 27. Under Public Resources Code sections 21081(a)(3) and 21081(b), and CEQA Guidelines sections 15091, 15092, and 15093, and to the extent reflected in the EIR and the MMRP, the City Council finds that the following impacts of the Project remain significant and unavoidable, notwithstanding the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures, as set forth below. The City Council also finds that any project alternative discussed in the EIR that may reduce the significance of these impacts is rejected as infeasible for the reasons given below. a. Air Quality: (1) Impact AQ -1 finds that construction activities associated with the proposed project could cause temporary emissions of dust or contaminants from equipment exhaust that could contribute to existing air quality violations or expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations. Mitigation Measure AQ - 1.1, which requires project sponsors to implement BAAQMD recommended PM 10 and diesel -powered equipment emission control measures for all -9-