My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2001-020 RDA 2001-002
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2001
>
Reso 2001-020 RDA 2001-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2012 5:21:32 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 11:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
2/5/2001
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
POTENTIALLY <br />ISSUES POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO <br /> SIGNIFICANT UNLESS .SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SOURCES <br /> .ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED <br />EXPLANATION: The project area can be described as an urbanized environment, with a majority of the acreage already developed <br />with buildings and/or covered with paving of some sort. The Revitalization Strategy includes site development plans and <br />illustrations of recommended in-fill development projects that may be developed at some in the future. With the exception of the <br />BART parking lot in-fill housing development, all of the proposals contained within the Strategy are at or below the development <br />densities anticipated by the General Plan and the Plaza Redevelopment Plan. Therefore, air quality impacts associated with any <br />future projects are anticipated to be less than significant. A preliminary traffic study (included as an appendix), which analyzed the <br />potential impact of developing the BART parking lot site with high-density housing found that all roadways/intersections would <br />operate within acceptable levels. Therefore, associated project-specific air quality impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. <br />It should be noted that the latest information provided by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) indicates that <br />the Bay Area is a designated non-attainment area for ozone and particulate matter (PM,o). Typically, the BAAQMD does not require <br />site-specific air quality analyses for projects that do not meet a minimum size threshold (several hundred thousand square feet for <br />non-residential buildings and more than 300 residential units). The current Draft General Plan analysis anticipated a housing <br />development of only 75 units on this site. Although the near-term impacts of this project are anticipated to be less than significant <br />(based on the TJKM report), due to the fact that the Strategy anticipates a housing project that is larger than that included in the <br />Draft General Plan, it is unlrnown at this time whether cumulative impacts as they relate to the non-attainments for ozone and <br />particulate matter could be potentially significant. The following mitigation measure has been recommended in order to reduce this <br />potentially significant cumulative impact to a level of insignificance: <br />• The applicant for the BART in-fill housing project shall be required to submit an air quality report which includes an <br />analysis of cumulative impacts, specifically as they pertain to the non-attainment pollutant criteria for the Bay Area. The <br />report shall be submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Director prior to issuance of building <br />permits. ,. <br />Short-term air quality impacts can be expected during the construction phase, especially for those future projects that may involve a <br />significant amount of grading or earth movement. Standard conditions of approval, including Best Management Practices for <br />running of construction equipment, watering-down of the construction. site, street-sweeping, and covering trucks that transport dirt <br />would mitigate this potentially significant impact to a level of insignificance. <br />6. BIOLQGICAL RESOURCES. Would the iro'cct: <br />a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either X 2, 5, 7 <br />directly or through habitat modifications, on <br />any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, <br />or special status species in local or regional <br />plans, policies, or regulations, or by the <br />California Department of Fish and Game or <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any X 2, 5, 7 <br />riparian habitat or other sensitive natural <br />community identified in local or regional <br />plans, policies, regulations or by the California <br />Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and. <br />Wildlife Service? <br />c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally X 2, 5, 7 <br />protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 <br />of the Clean Water Act (including, but not <br />limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) <br />through direct removal, filling, hydrological <br />interru tion, or other means? <br />CSLBART Revitalization Strategy - IS/ND 8 December/2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.