My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agmt 2001 Aquatic Dasign Group Inc
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agreements
>
2001
>
Agmt 2001 Aquatic Dasign Group Inc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2010 12:43:54 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 12:43:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agreement
Document Date (6)
9/17/2001
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2001-142
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />and <br />A minimum expense scenario that will make maximum use of existing facilities. <br />A cost recovery scenario based an approximate 70% -80% return on investment, <br />Another scenario based on providing optimal benefit to City residents <br />The plan shall compare the costs and benefits of each scenario's proposed improvements, <br />including such issues as facility siting, construction staging, constructibility, and cost (both <br />capital and operational) as well as potential revenue generation. Options should represent a <br />range of development costs and play features, targeting a variety ofuser groups. Review <br />alternatives with the Task Force to evaluate and select the preferred concept or combination of <br />concepts. Prepare a `Master Plan' that describes in detail the recommended aquatic facility <br />improvements on a site by site basis, and ranks them according to priority and cost. Additional <br />detail on the information expected in this plan is attached as Appendix A-1. <br />Complete the final report consisting of all previous memo reports, meeting minutes, feasibility <br />study, reduced and full size drawings and budget and schedule information. Assist in staff <br />presentation to City Council for report acceptance. <br />Meeting (#8): Present draft analysis to Task Force for review and critique. Present redesign <br />options to Task Force for review and critique. Finalize based on critique. Select <br />Preferred Scenario for Master Plan. <br />Meeting (#9): Assist City Staff in preparing presentation of study findings and Master Plan to <br />City Council. <br />Meeting (#10): Discussion of outstanding issues and preparation of Final Report. <br />City Tasks: <br />• Set program priorities. <br />• Confirm construction budget parameters. <br />• Review of and comment on draft reports. <br />Provide guidance on selection of preferred scenario. <br />Assist with presentations as necessary. <br />3.0 SCHEDULE: <br />The estimated timeframe for accomplishing the above tasks is as follows: <br />Task A roximate Ela sed Time <br />Evaluation of Existing Facilities (concurrent task) 10 weeks <br />Public Participation Work Plan 4 weeks <br />Needs Assessment <br />Master Plan <br />12 weeks <br />10 weeks <br />City A royal /Final Re ort 4 weeks <br />Total Elapsed Time 30 weeks <br />Note: <br />This project is tentatively scheduled to commence on or around September 2001. <br />Exhibit A Page A4 of 8 <br />09/11/01 Washington Manor Pool Refurbishment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.