RDA Reso 2001-010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the proj ect vicinity ~ X 2 above levels exis ' without the ro'ect? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity X ' 2 above levels existin without the ro'ect? ' e. For a project located within an airport land use plan, would the project expose people residing X 2,11 or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a prof ect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people ~ ~ ~ X 2,11' residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? EXPLAN~;TION: The project area is adjacent to Marina Boulevard on the north, the elevated BART tracks, the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks, and San Leandro Boulevard to the east, and an additional set of UPRR tracks to the west Marina . Boulevard is a major street and in the vicinity of the project area narrows down to 2 travel lanes. The UPRR accommodate both Amtrak trains and freight trains, with several trains per day traveling these tracks. The BART tracks have trains running intermittently between approximately 5:30 AM and 1 AIVi daily. Because of the existing elevated background noise environment, development of the McKevitt and Batarse Trust sites with automobile dealerships and service centers is not anticipated to result in a otentiall ~ si ifi t i i th i ti i i p y gn can ncrease n e ex s ng no se env ronment, nor is it anticipated to affect existing nearby uses. All servicing of ' , vehicles would occur inside of the buildings. Temporary and short-term increases in noise may be expected during the .construction phase. However, given the relatively short duration and the intermittent nature of the noise,, and with inclusion of BMPs regarding . construction equipment, impacts related to construction noise are.anticipated to be less than significant. Potentially significant noise impacts to workers in the new buildings are not.anticipated, as the new construction would be required to adhere to current Title 24 requirements for insulation of noise, and would be required to adhere to the General Plan noise levels for compatibility with the proposed use. The project area is not.located within an airport flight zone. and would therefore not affect future workers on the project site. a: Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial . in relation to the existing traffic load and. . ~ X ~ 2,10 . capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a ' substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume .to capacity ratio on roads, or con cation at intersections b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the X 2,10 county congestion management agency, for dear red roads or hi wa s? . c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, Including either an increase in traffic levels or X 2,11 a change in location that results in substantial saf risks? . d Substantially-increase hazards due to a design feature (e,g., sharp curves or dangerous ~ X ~ 2 intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm e 'meat ? e. Result in made ante ewer access? X ~ 2 f. Result in made ante arkin ca act ? X 2 g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or Programs supporting alternative transportation X Z e.., bus turnouts, bi le racks ? h. Trigger CMA Review? (GPA involving more than 100 p.m peak hour trips generated over X 2 existin eneral lan land use Zarina Square Auto Marl Expansion 11 August 2001 oriel Study Checklist