Laserfiche WebLink
• Minutes - City of San Leandro City Council and Page - 6 - <br /> Redevelopment Agency Meeting - August 19, 1996 <br /> 4.22 James Crew, 18 Crow Canyon Court, San Ramon, said he felt there was <br /> no reason for the City Council to support the ordinances or <br /> participate in gun legislation. He said if the tax ordinance <br /> pertained to only one gun dealer then there would be litigation. <br /> 4.23 Ruben Vargas, 564 East 14th Street, stated the City Council was not <br /> defending the Constitution; he does not support the ordinances. <br /> 4.24 Susan Riskind - Poulsen, 182 Sunnyside Drive, stated she was against <br /> putting guns in children's hands. This issue was not unconstitutional <br /> but is limiting an unsafe firearm. The rights of people include <br /> everyone. <br /> 4.25 Ken Pimentel, 3034 Revere Avenue, Oakland, stated that gun crime is <br /> a public health issue. He supports the ordinances. <br /> 4.26 Donald Beeler, 18857 California Street, Castro Valley, stated that to <br /> ban Saturday Night Specials is to ban small handguns; he stated that <br /> this was racism. <br /> 4.27 William Rae, 909 Shorepoint Court, Alameda, said he is against <br /> symbolism, that this is too small a percentage of crime to make a <br /> difference, and stated that later on all guns will be banned. <br /> 4.28 Doug Spittler, 1510 Fernside, Alameda, said this was a general war <br /> against guns and asked what was the purpose of the ordinances. He <br /> believes the opposite effect will occur. <br /> 4.29 Terry Ferris, 115 Turlock Way, Hayward, asked if the City was <br /> receiving funds from the Corridor Project and asked what the Council <br /> would like to accomplish with the ordinances. He suggested to take <br /> a survey of the community first, before deciding, and offered to <br /> assist. <br /> 4.30 Tim Heath, 15132 Crosby Street, stated he could not get an answer as <br /> to why the ordinances were needed. If this is a safety issue, why <br /> are police officers exempt. City Attorney Meyers stated that a staff <br /> report would be made later in the evening to answer the questions. <br /> 4.31 James Solbakken, 883 Island Drive, Alameda, said he considered this <br /> a secret law, and the Council does not know what they are doing with <br /> this issue. <br /> 4.32 Dana Johnson, 343 Farrelly Drive, said this was symbolic only, <br /> suggested the Council do something legitimate and go after the <br /> criminals and the plea bargaining system, and is opposed to the gross <br /> receipts tax. <br /> 4.33 Michele Walsh, 181 Best Avenue, said she is concerned about public <br /> safety, supports the City Council in taking a stand, and urged them <br /> to vote in favor of the ordinances. <br /> 4.34 Emery McGuire, 872 Serra Drive, said he is in favor of banning junk <br /> guns. <br />