Laserfiche WebLink
• serves as a collector of other bikeways or residential streets • <br /> • passes through the entire city <br /> A proposed bikeway route receives two points if one the following conditions is met: <br /> • does not qualify for three points <br /> • provides a "short cut" for another bikeway <br /> • serves as a bypass to busy arterial streets <br /> • connects to potential regional routes <br /> A proposed bikeway route receives one point if one the following conditions is met: <br /> • does not qualify for two or three points <br /> • connects to an existing bikeway on one end and a proposed bikeway on the other end <br /> • connects to proposed bikeways on both ends <br /> • <br /> Relative Ability to Implement (three points): The relative ability to implement a <br /> project was determined through a review of existing plans, field review of the study area, and <br /> the level of construction required for implementation. In general, a project is considered to <br /> have high implementation ability if no restriping or modification of existing layout is <br /> necessary. If restriping and minor modifications to the existing layout is required, the project <br /> is considered to have moderate implementation ability. If major construction, such as building <br /> a new Class I bike path, is required, the project is considered to have a low implementation <br /> ability. For ranking purpose, bikeway projects with a high implementation ability were given <br /> three points, projects with moderate implementation ability were given two points, and projects <br /> with low implementation ability were given one point. <br /> The project scoring resulted in the grouping of the projects into three implementation categories <br /> based on their relative scores. The three categories are defined as follows: <br /> Phase 1: Projects which received the highest relative scores and are recommended for <br /> highest priority consideration for implementation. <br /> Phase 2: Moderate relative scores and the second group of projects considered for funding <br /> and implementation. • <br /> Phase 3: The lowest relative scores and the third group considered for funding. Although. <br /> 44 <br />