Laserfiche WebLink
POTENTIALLY <br /> POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN <br /> NO <br /> SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES IMPACT <br /> ISSUES m r/cgnov w,,^cr <br /> INCORPORATED <br /> ��� h5 <br /> a. Physically divide an established community? X 1,2 <br /> b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X 1,2.I4 <br /> regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br /> project (including, but not limited to the general <br /> plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br /> ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br /> mitigating an environmental effect? <br /> c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation X | <br /> plan or natural community conservation plan? <br /> EXPLANATION: <br /> a) Physical division of an existing community would typically be associated with construction of a new <br /> highway, railroad, subway, park, or other linear feature. In this case, the project is a Genera! Plan consistency <br /> amendment and would have no such effect. Land use impacts were previously analyzed in the General Plan <br /> E|R. the TUD Strategy 8K,and the Housing Element IS/ND. <br /> b) The express purpose of the consistency amendments is to avoid conflicts between local plans. There would <br /> be no conflict as a result of this action, and an existing conflict would be removed. <br /> c) The General Plan consistency amendments do not propose land use changes to any area covered by a Habitat <br /> Conservation Plan or Community Conservation Plan. <br /> o- Induce substantial population growth in an area either X 1,2.3,5 <br /> directly, for example, by proposing new homes and <br /> businesses, or indirectly, through projects in an <br /> undeveloped area or major infrastructure? <br /> b. Displace substantial number of existing housing. X 1,2.5 <br /> necessitating the construction of replacement housing <br /> elsewhere? <br /> c- Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating X 1,2.5 <br /> the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? <br /> EXPLANATION: <br /> a) Both the TOD Strategy and the Housing Element are intended to facilitate the production of housing. The impact of the <br /> TOD Strategy on housing was previously analyzed in the EIR certified in September 2007, while the impact of the <br /> Housing Element was previously analyzed in the Negative Declaration certified in April 2010. No further impacts will <br /> result due to the General Plan consistency amendments. <br /> b) The General Plan consistency amendments will have no impact on housing or necessitate replacement housing. Impacts <br /> of the TOD Strategy and Housing Element were previously evaluated in CEQA documents for each project. <br /> c) The General Plan consistency amendments will not displace people or necessitate construction of replacement housing. <br /> Too and Housing Element Genera! P!an Consistency Amendments January 2011 • Page 9 <br />