Laserfiche WebLink
(c) Any impacts related to unstable or potentially geologic units were previously evaluated and appropriately mitigated in the <br /> EIR for the General Plan and the TOD Strategy. No further impacts would occur as a result of amending the General <br /> Plan to achieve internal consistency. <br /> (d) Any risks associated with development on expansive soil related to development in the Downtown TOD area were <br /> previously evaluated by the EIR for the General Plan and the TOD Strategy. No further impacts would occur as a result <br /> of amending the General Plan to achieve internal consistency. <br /> (e) There are no septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems associated with the General Plan consistency <br /> amendments. <br /> (f) There would no wind or water impact associated with the General Plan consistency amendments. <br /> (g) There would be no erosion of beaches, changes in siltation patterns or changes to streams resulting from the General Plan <br /> consistency amendments. The potential for siltation and erosion impacts on San Leandro Creek were previously <br /> evaluated by the TOD Strategy EIR and appropriate measures to mitigate impacts were cited in that document. <br /> POTENTIALLY <br /> POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN <br /> NO <br /> ISSUES SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT SOURCES <br /> IMPACT <br /> ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED <br /> f ..'rakt:wa.+ ^ +, ly ..C•■. a 'irr v an :* LT AC a e$,- 4 �y:a 4 <br /> !✓ �,,� ,/ to , -9C / . <br /> 3 sHYDROLOGY:AND WATER UAI ITY ,Would'the project. � 3 w K a ` s ' . r • ' <br /> ±a-.1, - , ?rraaa.rr. atWeir -. Q cvav,1/44 — , —t ,� -. ✓A... .«r - ., 9i :>fe <br /> a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X 1,2,3 <br /> requirements? <br /> b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X 1.2 <br /> substantially with groundwater recharge such that there <br /> would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of <br /> the local groundwater table level, for example, the <br /> production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop <br /> to a level which would not support existing land uses or <br /> planned uses for which permits have been granted? <br /> c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the X 12 <br /> site or area, including alteration of the course of a stream <br /> or river, in a manner which would result in substantial <br /> erosion or siltation on- or off -site? <br /> d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the X 1,2 <br /> site or area, including alteration of the course of a stream <br /> or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of <br /> surface runoff in a manner which would result in <br /> flooding on- or off -site? <br /> e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed X 1,2 <br /> the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage <br /> systems or provide substantial additional sources of <br /> polluted runoff'? <br /> f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X 1,2 <br /> g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as X 1,2,3,5,6 <br /> mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood <br /> Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) or other flood hazard <br /> delineation map? <br /> h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures X 1,2,3,6 <br /> which would impede or redirect flood flows? - <br /> TOD and Housing Element General Plan Consistency Amendments January 20 l I • Page I I <br />