Laserfiche WebLink
d) Amending the General Plan to achieve consistency with the previously adopted and analyzed TOD Strategy and <br /> Housing Element would not by itself expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The General <br /> Plan already includes policies to mitigate air quality impacts on sensitive receptors and these would continue to <br /> apply. <br /> e) Amending the General Plan to achieve consistency with the previously adopted and analyzed TOD Strategy would <br /> not create objectionable odors. <br /> POTENTIALLY <br /> POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO <br /> ISSUES SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED � <br /> 6 B r ICA L 5RES O C ES's.�V o Id he pro .� fi r gg s� ��.rJ���'»_a„ {;;), 2. 2 is sx.w te, +aran r.0 .. �-: 1a ,wu _... �!w��4'l. <br /> � '"e t, `{ gNI q tr <br /> a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or <br /> through habitat modifications, on any species identified <br /> as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local X I,2 8 <br /> or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the <br /> California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish <br /> ' and Wildlife Service? <br /> b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat <br /> or other sensitive natural community identified in local <br /> or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the X 1,2,8 <br /> California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and <br /> Wildlife Service? <br /> c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected <br /> wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water <br /> Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, X 1,2,3 <br /> coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, <br /> hydrological interruption, or other means? <br /> d- Interfere substantially with the movement of any native <br /> • resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with <br /> established native resident or migratory wildlife X 1,2 <br /> corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery <br /> sites? <br /> e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting <br /> biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy X 1,2,3 <br /> or ordinance? <br /> f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat <br /> Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation X 1,2 <br /> Plan or other approved local, regional, or state habitat • <br /> conservation plan? <br /> EXPLANATION: <br /> a) Amending the General Plan to establish internal consistency with the previously adopted and analyzed TOD Strategy and <br /> Housing Element would have no effect on lands designated for the protection of biological or natural resources. These <br /> lands include the shoreline marshland, the regional park at Oyster Bay, and the undeveloped areas east of the city in the <br /> sphere of influence. None of these areas are proximate to the area covered by the TOD Strategy. <br /> TOD and Housing Element General Plan Consistency Amendments January 2011 ' Page 14 <br /> • <br />