Laserfiche WebLink
POTENTIALLY <br /> POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN <br /> NO <br /> SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES <br /> IMPACT <br /> ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED <br /> S RU St AfER I A L S V 9ldtheproje r�fi :- z {y j�' 'a+z `` as <br /> a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X 12 <br /> environment through the routine transport, use, or <br /> disposal of hazardous materials? <br /> b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X 1,2 <br /> environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and <br /> accident conditions involving the release of hazardous <br /> materials into the environment? <br /> c- Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or X 1,2 <br /> acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within <br /> one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? <br /> d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of X 1,2 <br /> hazardous materials sites and, as a result, would create a <br /> significant hazard to the public or the environment? <br /> e. For a project located within an airport land use plan, X 1,2,9 <br /> would the project result in a safety hazard for people <br /> residing or working in the project area? <br /> f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, X 1,2 <br /> would the project result in a safety hazard for people <br /> residing or working in the project area? <br /> g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X 1,2,3 <br /> adopted emergency response plan or emergency <br /> evacuation plan? <br /> h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X 1,2 <br /> injury or death involving wildland fires, including where <br /> wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where <br /> residences are intermixed with wildlands? <br /> EXPLANATION: <br /> a) Adoption of the General Plan consistency amendments would not result in any transport, use, or disposal of hazardous <br /> materials. Policies have already been integrated into the General Plan to address hazardous wastes, and the program - <br /> level impacts associated with growth have already been evaluated in the TOD Strategy EIR and General Plan EIR. <br /> b) The consistency amendments would not result in any increased risk of upset or accident conditions involving the release <br /> of hazardous materials into the environment. The potential for such impacts was previously evaluated in the TOD <br /> Strategy EIR and the General Plan EIR and was determined to be less than significant. The amendments would not <br /> increase the potential for impacts. As appropriate, subsequent development projects will be subject to hazardous <br /> materials release risk assessments, along with a requirement to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local <br /> hazardous materials regulations. <br /> c) The General Plan consistency amendments would not cause the emission of hazardous materials or require the handling <br /> of hazardous materials within one - quarter mile of a school. These impacts were previously addressed in the TOD EIR <br /> and General Plan EIR and were determined to be less than significant. <br /> TOD and Housing Element General Plan Consistency Amendments January 2011 • Page 16 <br />