Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • Aviation Committee January 13, 2005 <br /> Master Plan Progress Report Page 4 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • 1 Master Plan Passenger Forecasts <br /> Existing 2010 2012 • 2025 <br /> Million Annual 14.1 18 20 30 <br /> • . Passengers (12 months ending <br /> (MAP) Nov: 2004) <br /> Planning Day 43,745 56,047 63,158 93,412 <br /> • <br /> • . Passengers (August 2004) <br /> • <br /> • (Average Day, <br /> • <br /> Peak Month) <br /> Daily Flights/ 430 542 598 n/a <br /> Operationst't (August 2004) <br /> (1) A flight or operation is one take -off or landing. In other words, if there are 430 flights, there are 215 take -offs <br /> (departures) and 215 Landings (arrivals). <br /> • n/a = not available <br /> Based on simulation analyses that count the number of aircraft by airline on the ground • <br /> • throughout the day, and more traditional master plan calculation techniques, it was estimated <br /> that the Airport will need between 46 and 50 total aircraft gates (between 17 and 21 gates more <br /> than the current gates plus those under construction) to accommodate passenger demand in <br /> the 2010 to 2012 timeframe. From a level of service perspective, 46 to 50 total aircraft gates <br /> results in between 6 to 6.5 departures-per gate per day, and 37,000 to 42,000 passengers per <br /> gate in the peak month (August). This compares to 8.9 daily departures per gate per day in <br /> August 2004 (from 24 gates), and •56,500 passengers per gate in August 2004. The national <br /> average is about 5.5 departures per gate per day, with Mineta San Jose International Airport <br /> • having approximately 6.3 departures per gate per day from 31 gates (based on June 2004 <br /> • data). • <br /> Atthough runway capacity /delay /congestion will be the topic of a future Aviation Stakeholder <br /> Advisory Committee meeting (in March and April 2005), it appears, based on preliminary <br /> • analyses, that the number of aircraft operations required to serve 18 to 20 MAP can be • <br /> accommodated on the existing South Feld runway (Runway 11 -29), with some reasonable <br /> • . increase in delay (there is almost no delay today). <br /> • <br /> Port staff and the Stakeholder .Advisory Committee reviewed three possible areas for future <br /> terminal development that could accommodate 17 to 21 additional gates (i.e., beyond existing <br /> gates plus those currently under construction). The three areas are shown on a graphic titled <br /> . • "Potential Terminal Development Areas." Port staff prepared 13 potential terminal development • <br /> concepts (2 concepts in Area 1, 9 concepts in Area 2, and 2 concepts in Area 3). For each <br /> concept, the following planning considerations were discussed: <br /> • Runway access/taxiways <br /> • • Remote aircraft parking area <br /> • <br /> • Landside access roads, wayfinding, curbside length, parking (area and revenue) <br /> • <br /> • Walking distances <br /> • Environmental constraints <br /> • Constructability (existing facilities must remain operational) <br /> • • Total project cost (including environmental mitigations, replacement facilities, etc.) <br /> • Other considerations specific to a particular concept • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br />