My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Airport Highlights 2004 0902
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Airport Committee
>
Airport Highlights 2004 0902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:39:17 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:39:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
9/2/2004
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Sheila Young <br /> • • <br /> July 15, 2004 <br /> Page 8 of 9 <br /> straight into either 27R or 27L from many miles out, as if he were following an <br /> ILS. We have compared the Tower counts for IFR and VFR arrivals for July 1 -8, <br /> 2004, with flight tracks from the Airport's noise monitoring system, and believe <br /> that the following data collected by the Tower provides a reasonable estimate for <br /> the information requested: <br /> • <br /> IFR arrivals on North Field for an average summer day (24 hrs) = 56 <br /> IFR arrivals on North Field for an average summer night (10 p.m. — 6 a.m.) = 9 <br /> 13) As you know, relocation of the ILS from 27R to 27L is a condition of the <br /> November 2000 Settlement Agreement between the City of San Leandro and the <br /> City of Oakland (Section 8). If the ILS is not relocated and instead a second ILS <br /> is added to the North Field, further discussions will be required between the City <br /> and the Port regarding the implications this action will have on the terms of the <br /> Settlement Agreement. <br /> Answer: The Port is aware of each of its settlement agreement obligations. The <br /> Port will not make any decisions regarding the ILS issues without engaging the <br /> City of San Leandro. <br /> 14) Please explain the benefits of having two instrument landing systems at the <br /> North Field for San Leandro. <br /> Answer: Airports and the FAA always like to have duplicate systems as back up <br /> in case something happens to one of them. This may be of Tess benefit to San <br /> Leandro, but it would help maintain consistent flight procedures that the <br /> neighbors are accustomed to seeing. <br /> Secondly, having two ILS's gives the Airport and FAA more flexibility in directing <br /> traffic and establishing noise abatement procedures since either runway would <br /> be able to accommodate instrument traffic equally. For example, it would allow <br /> the Airport to use 27L during the day for training flights, while instrument flights <br /> use 27R, and then direct instrument flights (and all flights when traffic allows) to <br /> 27L during night (and possibly evening) hours when activity subsides. <br /> Third, as mentioned above in Number 11, this would allow touch and go <br /> operations to remain over non - residential areas while accommodating instrument <br /> arrivals on 27R. During May 2004, there were 2,659 touch and go arrivals to <br /> North Field, which averages out to 86 touch and go arrivals /day. There would be <br /> a noticeable difference in the number of flights over San Leandro neighborhoods <br /> if the training activity were shifted to 27R. The FAA prefers to separate slow <br /> moving, touch and go traffic by small aircraft from instrument arrivals by other <br /> aircraft. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.