My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2011-192
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2011
>
Reso 2011-192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2011 12:15:40 PM
Creation date
11/30/2011 12:05:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
11/21/2011
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2450 Washington Avenue Apartments 11 October 2011 <br />POTENTIALLY <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN <br />NO <br />ISSUES <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />IMPACT <br />SOURCES <br />ISSUES <br />MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />INCORPORATED <br />Geology /Soils (Continued) <br />Mitigation Measure #16: Following any required stripping and removal of any loose and /or soft soil and <br />undocumented fills, the top eight inches of exposed native ground for rill areas shall be scarified, moisture <br />conditioned as necessary, and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90% at a moisture content of at <br />least 2 percent above optimum, as determined by ASTM D1557 -07 Laboratory Test Procedure. <br />Mitigation Measure #I7: All recommendations set forth in the May 11, 2009 Geotechnical Investigation shall be <br />followed to ensure proper site preparation and grading of the project site is implemented, including adherence to <br />Best Management Practices (BMPs). <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measures #1I to #17 reduce potential Impacts to a less than significant level. <br />e-) No -septic tank&-or leach- field - systems- are - proposed -as- part -of- the - project,, but rather wastewater- disposal - would -be- <br />handled through the sanitary sewer system. Therefore, no significant impact will occur. <br />V. <br />a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or X 13, 14, 15 <br />indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the <br />environment? <br />b. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation <br />X <br />13, 14, 15 <br />of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the <br />emissions of greenhouse gases? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a,b) The State of California is concerned about GHG emissions and their effect on global climate change. Extensive research <br />on the effect of human activity on global climate continues to occur. Many studies have identified the Iink between <br />emissions of GHG and rising global temperatures, with recent evidence presented by the United Nations <br />Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change QPCC) in 2007 that finds overwhelming evidence that human activity is <br />causing global warming. Impacts to California from this climate change could be reduced snow pack, increased risk of <br />wildfires, increased flooding potential, and reductions in the quality and quantity of agricultural products. <br />The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) adopted thresholds that establish a significance threshold of <br />1,100 metric tons (MT) of CO2e /year. The proposed project was evaluated utilizing the BAAQMD's June 2010 project - <br />level CEQA guidelines for criteria pollutants and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHGs). Similar to regulated air pollutants, <br />GHG emissions and global climate change also represent cumulative impacts. GHG emissions contribute, on a <br />cumulative basis, to the significant adverse environmental impacts of global climate change. No single project could <br />generate enough GHG emissions to noticeably change the global average temperature, however, the combination of GHG <br />emissions from past, present and future projects contribute substantially to the phenomenon of global climate change and <br />its associated environmental impacts. <br />Utilizing the URBEMIS 2007 computer model provided on the BAAQMD's website, the proposed project was evaluated <br />for its project -level contributions to regional criteria air pollutants and precursors (ROG, NOx, PM10, PM25 and CO). <br />Those results were then run through the BAAQMD Greenhouse Gas Model to quantify GHG emissions from the proposed <br />project. That analysis determined that the proposed project would generate 1,047.55 MT of CO2e /year which is below the <br />1,100 MT CO2e /year threshold of significance for project -level impacts. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with <br />the implementing programs and regulations to achieve the statewide GHG emission reduction goals established under AB <br />32, the State's Global Warming Solutions Act. The proposed project will not create significant Greenhouse Gas <br />emissions /air quality impacts, therefore no mitigation is required. <br />4 s <br />a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X 4,7 <br />environment through the routine transport, use, or <br />2450 Washington Avenue Apartments 11 October 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.