Laserfiche WebLink
Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies <br />5 of11 <br />E _ -. M U z Res Agency <br />Ordinance or Resolution 4 (if existing <br />a <br />o a or Depart ment <br />program }. Estimated Cost and <br />m n m .� (Requ if Exisling <br />Possible Funding Agency (d high <br />Specific Mitigation Strategy <br />,p Q @ Program. Existing <br />prlorlly). Esllmated Dale or <br />m <br />Z _ Q, m Program under <br />I `m Y H <br />Completion (d study), WHY if not <br />N Zy �., o a ,� s v � funded, Very High, <br />same as regional priority, OR Other <br />V] <br />4 2 W Lu 7 7 m 9 o _ �° J- , z U High, or Under Study) <br />Comments <br />Ir4 <br />Install specially engineered pipelines in areas <br />EQ <br />X <br />Engineering and <br />Ground conditions considered as <br />subject to faulting, liquefaction, earthquake-induced <br />Transportation <br />partordesign process. Higher <br />landsliding, or other earthquake hazard. <br />priority placed on large diameter, <br />h igher flow pipelines or high risk <br />lines such as creek or freeway <br />crossings. <br />h <br />Replace or retrofit water- retention st <br />EQ <br />XX <br />EBMUD <br />are determined to be structurally deficient, including <br />levees, dams, reservoirs and tanks- <br />b-6 <br />Install portable facilities (such as hoses, pumps, <br />EQ <br />XX <br />ERMth] <br />emergency generators, or other equipment) to allow <br />pipelines to bypass failure zones such as fault <br />rupture areas, areas of liquefaction, and other <br />ground Failure areas (using a priority scheme if <br />funds are not available for installation at all needed <br />. l ocations ) - <br />ECG <br />XX <br />EBMUD <br />b-7 <br />Install earthquake - resistant connections when pipes <br />enter and exit bridges and work with bridge owners <br />to encours ga retrofit of these stmclu res. <br />EQ <br />Engineering & <br />Retrofitted or replaced buildings <br />b <br />Comply with all applicable building and fire codes, <br />as well as other regulations (such as state <br />Transportation and <br />have been built to code <br />requirements For fault, landslide, and liquefaction <br />Community <br />investigations in particular mapped areas) when <br />Development <br />constructing or significantly remodeling <br />infrastructure facilities. <br />b-9 <br />Clarify to workers in critical facilities and emergency <br />EQ <br />City Manager <br />This can be incorporated into <br />personn al, as well as to elected officials and tha <br />futuretraining. <br />public, the extent to which the facilities are expecte <br />to perform only at a life safety level (allowing for the <br />safe evacuation of personnel) or are expected to <br />remain functional following an earthquake. <br />EQ <br />Transit agencies <br />b-10 <br />Develop a water -based transportation "system" <br />across the Bay for use in the event or major <br />earthquakes. Implementation of such a system <br />could prove extremely useful in the event of <br />structural failure of either the road - bridge systems <br />or BART and might serve as an adjunct to existing <br />transportation system elements in the movement of <br />IargB numbers of people andlor goods. <br />5 of11 <br />