My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2012 0221
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
Packet 2012 0221
>
3B Public Hearing 2012 0221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2012 3:27:37 PM
Creation date
2/15/2012 5:50:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
2/21/2012
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2012 0221 CD+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0221
8D Consent 2012 0305
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0305
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes December 15, 2011 <br />Agenda No. II -I2 Page 2 of 9 <br />Senior Planner Livermore also reported that no comments were submitted on the Initial Study <br />and Negative Declaration during the 20 -day comment period, but Bal Theatre owner Dan Dillman <br />had submitted a letter (dated December 15, 2011) about the proposed changes to the Planning <br />Commission (see attached). She summarized his concerns addressed in the letter to the Planning <br />Commission. Commissioner Crow distributed a packet of supplemental information (see <br />attached), including "before" and "after" zoning maps, to the other Planning Commissioners and <br />staff that he prepared for the meeting. He noted that staff s proposal would eliminate about 80% <br />of the space now available for Commercial Recreation and Entertainment Activities. He said he <br />cannot see eliminating all of this space in the City as a plausible action. Commissioner Crow <br />noted that Article 7 of the Zoning Code has strip clubs and artists' studios as permitted uses and <br />daycare facilities and hazardous waste repositories as conditionally permitted uses. <br />Commissioner Crow added that he can imagine a nuclear storage facility next door to a daycare <br />center, with a strip club or sex shop 1,000 feet away. At the same time, he said, the proposals <br />would prohibit putting a family recreation center into a warehouse. In an infill city such as San <br />Leandro, he said, the only places to house activities such as indoor soccer fields and rock - <br />climbing facilities, bowling alleys, go -kart race tracks, etc., would be in light industrial buildings. <br />Referring to Senior Planner Livermore's point about Fremont being a much larger city, he asked <br />about Santa Clara. He noted that the San Leandro Chamber of Commerce and City staff have put <br />a great deal of effort into emulating some neighboring cities when it comes to tech - sector <br />recruitment. He noted that commercial recreation and entertainment are conditionally permitted in <br />industrial areas by Santa Clara's zoning code. He also pointed out that healthcare professionals <br />San Leandro wants to potentially attract with the new Kaiser medical center in the City would <br />want access to quality recreation, as would the highly educated professionals and "tekkies." <br />Commissioner Crow noted the irony of having tech - sector recruitment among the reasons behind <br />the proposal to eliminate Commercial Recreation and Entertainment Activities from the City's <br />industrial districts. <br />Commissioner Crow questioned whether the review of Commercial Recreation, Entertainment <br />Activities and Assembly Uses in the Zoning Code is in fact part of a periodic process, because <br />Entertainment Activities and Assembly Uses are particularly sensitive at this time. He cited <br />General Plan Policy 10.05, Retail Encroachment, which seeks to protect the industrial base by <br />limiting expansion of big box retail and other larger retail uses in industrial areas. This called for <br />a specific action, he said, and he doesn't understand why a periodic review would not address <br />removing big -box retail stores from among the permitted uses in the industrial areas. <br />Commissioner Crow also cited General Plan Policy 8.07, Cultural Arts and Entertainment, <br />which fosters opportunities for cultural, recreational and entertainment uses in the City like <br />theatres, cinemas, art galleries and live entertainment venues The City does have the Bal Theatre <br />and a new art gallery, he acknowledged, but the proposed changes seem counterproductive to this <br />General Plan policy. <br />In researching whether residents of San Leandro have an appetite for more entertainment, <br />Commissioner Crow identified a City survey in which respondents chose live shows, concerts and <br />skating as their top three preferences and noted the proposal would eliminate all of them from the <br />industrial districts. Another survey asked residents how important they considered certain types <br />of developments in the City; entertainment places received the highest responses, at 80 %, with <br />other options being restaurants, small businesses and stores and large retail stores. <br />Commissioner Crow said that he suspects a conclusion to make the proposed changes was <br />drawn at some point, and then staff came up with justification for that conclusion, and he wants to <br />know the real reasoning behind the proposal. Considering that transparency is among Mayor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.