My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2013 0401
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0401
>
3B Public Hearing 2013 0401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2013 4:08:07 PM
Creation date
3/26/2013 5:54:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
4/1/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0401 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0401
Reso 2013-043
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less than <br />Significant Impact No Impact <br />XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: <br />a, induce substantial population growth in an area either directly (for example, <br />by proposing new homes and businesses or indirectly (for example, <br />through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (1,3) <br />• 0 • X <br />b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the <br />construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • • • X <br />c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of <br />replacement housing elsewhere?1 <br />Comment a.-c.: The Drooosed wind turbine Will not involve snv additional <br />housing. It would not induce population growth, would not displace <br />housing and would not displace people. <br />0 0 X <br />XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. <br />a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts: aissociated <br />with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need <br />for new or physically altered government facilities* the construction of <br />which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain <br />acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives <br />for any of the public services: <br />Fire protection? <br />Police protection? <br />Schools? <br />Parks? <br />Other public facilities? <br />Comment: The proposed wind turbine would not increase the need for <br />additional fiublic services. <br />• • • X <br />• Q 0 X <br />• • • X <br />. • • o X <br />• 0 0 X <br />XV. RECREATION. <br />a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional <br />parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical <br />deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (5,34), <br />• 0 a X <br />b. Opes the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or <br />expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical <br />effect on the environment? (1) <br />Comment a.-b.: The proposed wind turbine would not result in additional <br />recreational needs. <br />• • 0 X <br />XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: <br />a. Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing <br />traffic load anfl capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a.substantial <br />increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio <br />on roads, or congestion at Intersections)? <br />• • • X <br />12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.