Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT EIR <br /> EXHIBIT A: WORK SCOPE AND COSTS <br /> staff will request use of the model from the Alameda CTC. CMP and Metropolitan <br /> Transportation System(MTS)roadways in the Project vicinity include 1-880 and San Leandro <br /> Boulevard. The final list of regional roadway and transit corridors will be determined after <br /> review of the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) letter responding to the <br /> NOP. The budget for the CMP analysis assumes that the model will be executed for the 2020 <br /> and 2035 horizon years to establish a baseline link volume forecast for the analysis roadways <br /> to which the Project traffic will be manually added for each alternative. <br /> 8. DETAILED SITE PLAN REVIEW <br /> KAI may review the Project site plan to ensure safe and efficient circulation of vehicles, <br /> bicycles,and pedestrian through the Project site and on the roadways adjacent to the Project <br /> site. KAI may review Project site plan for each phase of development in terms of: <br /> Site access and interface with roadway network including adequacy of turn-pocket <br /> lengths,driveway throat lengths,and sight distance <br /> ♦ Emergency vehicle access and circulation <br /> ♦ Pedestrian access and circulation <br /> ♦ Bicycle access and circulation <br /> ♦ Transit vehicle access and circulation within the site and on adjacent roadways <br /> ♦ Pedestrian access and to and from transit stops <br /> ♦ Truck circulation and loading dock operations <br /> ♦ Analyze construction impacts <br /> 9. PARKING SUPPLY AND DEMAND ANALYSIS <br /> Parking demands for the retail.and non-retail components of the project will be estimated <br /> using the rates published by ITE in Parking Generation. Minimum amount of parking as <br /> required by the City's Zoning Ordinance will also be calculated. This analysis will assume that <br /> there will be shared parking between the retail and non-retail components. Parking <br /> mitigation will address potential opportunities for shared parking between various land uses. <br /> 10. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS <br /> KAI will qualitatively evaluate up to six alternatives(by comparing vehicle trip generation)to <br /> determine whether they would lessen or eliminate the significant impacts identified for the <br /> proposed Project. The evaluation will be based on a comparison of the relative trip <br /> generation characteristics of the alternatives. <br /> THE PLANNING CENTER I DC&E 9 <br /> MAY 1,2013 <br />