My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2013-102
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2013
>
Reso 2013-102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 8:53:45 AM
Creation date
8/8/2013 2:13:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
7/15/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
3A Public Hearing 2013 0715
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0715
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
must be identified and, if quantifiable, calculated and factored out of the assessment cost basis to produce a "net" cost <br />figure. In addition, Proposition 218 no longer automatically exempts government owned property from being assessed <br />and if special benefit is determined to be conferred upon such properties, they must be assessed in proportion to special <br />benefits conferred in a manner similar to privately owned property assessments. <br />From this, the value of a basic benefit unit or "basic net unit cost" can be computed by dividing the total amount of <br />estimated net program costs by the total number of benefit units. The amount of assessment for each identified parcel <br />can be computed at this time by multiplying the Net Unit Cost times the number of Basic Benefit Units per identified <br />parcel. This is known as "spreading the assessment" or the "assessment spread" in that all costs are allocated <br />proportionally or "spread" amongst all identified properties within the CBD. <br />The method and basis of spreading program costs varies from one CBD to another based on local conditions, types of <br />programs and activities proposed, and size and development complexity of the CBD. <br />Supplemental Proposition 218 Procedures and Requirements <br />Proposition 218, approved by the voters of California in November of 1996, adds a supplemental array of procedures <br />and requirements to be carried out prior to levying a property-based assessment like the Downtown San Leandro CBD. <br />These requirements are in addition to requirements imposed by State and local assessment enabling laws. These <br />requirements were "chaptered" into law as Article XIIID of the California Constitution. <br />Since Prop 218 provisions will affect all subsequent calculations to be made in the final assessment formula for the <br />Downtown San Leandro CBD, Prop 218 requirements will be taken into account. The key provisions of Prop 218 along <br />with a description of how the Downtown San Leandro CBD complies with each of these provisions are delineated <br />below. <br />(Note: All section references below pertain to Article XIII of the California Constitution): <br />Finding 1. From Section 4(a): "Identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and <br />upon which an assessment will be imposed" <br />All "identified" parcels within the proposed Downtown San Leandro CBD will derive special benefit from the proposed <br />District programs and activities. The benefits are special and unique only to the identified properties within the <br />proposed District because programs and services will only be provided directly for the identified properties. All CBD <br />parcels are identified by assessor parcel number and shown on the Boundary Map in the Management District Plan and <br />are listed in Attachment 1 to this Report. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.