My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action 2013 1118 Attachment
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 1118
>
10A Action 2013 1118 Attachment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2013 4:53:36 PM
Creation date
11/13/2013 4:53:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
11/18/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
10A Action 2013 1118
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 1118
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> Managing Tomorrow’s Resources Today <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Wolff <br />October 4, 2013 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />annual expense adjustment factor could be higher, with a corresponding increase in the <br />required fee for the Proposed System Expansion. <br />5. The current tip fee revenue stream is projected to decrease from $2,119,900 for FY 12‐13 to <br />$1,171,750 for FY 19‐20, resulting from the decline in the rate of disposal of solid waste to <br />landfill, and based on StopWaste’s most recent tonnage projections. Future projected decreases <br />in landfill tonnage result from the success of diversion programs. The state of the economy over <br />the planning period could also affect the rate of disposal and the amount of revenue collected. <br />We understand that the tonnage and revenue projections are updated on an ongoing basis, and <br />recommend that StopWaste staff inform the relevant Agency committees and boards should <br />future tip fee revenues differ significantly from the projections. <br />6. Projected new fee revenues for the Proposed System Expansion include an increased annual <br />amount to be transferred to the City of Fremont for its HHW program, in lieu of the current <br />amount transferred from the County Fund under the present MOU with Fremont. Conversely, <br />the Austerity option results in a comparable sharp decrease in transfer of funding to the <br />Fremont program. StopWaste and County Program staff developed an approach for revenue <br />sharing that balances populations served and revenue collected for the Fremont facility’s service <br />area. Fremont staff is supportive of that approach. HF&H assisted in early development of the <br />approach and concurs that it appears to provide an equitable distribution of funding under both <br />options. <br />The following provides additional detail regarding Attachments 2 through 5. <br />Attachment 2 projects HHW system expenses and revenues for the planning period, through FY 19‐20 <br />(June 30, 2020). The Attachment 2 figure for new annual revenue of $5,072,038 (or a total of <br />$30,432,226 over the six years from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2020) includes the annual County <br />Auditor processing cost of $84,783 for billing the fee through the property tax system. Note the <br />projected decline in tip fee revenue. “Other ongoing revenue” consists primarily of interest. Attachment <br />2 shows the portion of the new revenues that will be needed to fund the Fremont facility in order to <br />provide a consistent level of service for the entire system. <br />Attachment 3 provides the detailed projection of HHW system expenses, and shows the County Auditor <br />processing cost. Note that on Attachment 3, FY 14‐15 is split into two half‐years. This was done to show <br />how staffing expenses for the System Expansion begin in the first half of the fiscal year as new staff is <br />hired. The full of Expansion System costs begins in mid fiscal year, on January 1, 2015 when the new <br />expanded services become available to the public. As noted above, expenses are generally escalated by <br />2.5 percent per year. PaintCare expenses are the one exception. Due to uncertainty about the actual <br />levels of savings that will occur, the savings are not escalated. <br />Attachments 4 and 5 in general mirror the contents of Attachments 2 and 3, but for the Austerity <br />option.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.