My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8E Consent 2013 1202
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 1202
>
8E Consent 2013 1202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2013 2:32:19 PM
Creation date
11/27/2013 5:15:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
12/2/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 1202 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 1202
Reso 2013-153
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2013
Reso 2013-154
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
City of San Leandro <br />Proposal to Provide Revenue Measure Feasibility Polling Services <br />Godbe Research Page 6 <br />“Potential support,” and “Strong opposition”. These profiles outline <br />the various voter subgroups and their level of support for targeting <br />supporters in any education/outreach or other campaign. <br /> <br /> Presenting the results and recommendations from the survey to City staff and <br />administration, as well as the San Leandro City Council for up to two project <br />presentations. <br /> <br /> Post project consulting with the City and other project stakeholders on the <br />results and recommendations from the survey throughout the revenue <br />measure processes, as needed, and at no additional charge. <br /> <br /> Optional development of a tracking survey of 350 (n=350) voters likely to vote <br />in the specific election cycle of interest (June or November 2014), should the <br />Council move towards a revenue measure and a specific cycles for that <br />measure. <br /> <br /> We recommend a survey instrument of approximately 12 to 15- <br />minutes in length for any tracking survey conducted for the City, and a <br />sample size of 350 overall voters will provide for a margin of error of <br />no greater than +/-5.22% at the 95% confidence level, when looking <br />voters likely to vote in either June or November 2014.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.