Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - May 17, 1993 Page - 17 - <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br /> Council Member Corbett said she had heard a comment that soil <br /> conditions should be reviewed every two years and asked what sorts of <br /> conditions may change in that period. <br /> Mr. King said the property did not need to be tested again because <br /> there have been no changes in the soils, and his firm would also be <br /> involved in the geotechnical process during construction. He said the <br /> site has also withstood all of the rain very well . <br /> Mayor Karp said the owners of homes above the property are concerned <br /> regarding slippage. He asked what the responsibility would be of the <br /> Geotechnical Engineer and what sort of protection would be operative <br /> for property owners above the site. Mr. King said he had not evaluated <br /> the homes above the site. <br /> Mayor Karp asked what would happen if this site slipped and caused <br /> damage to the homes above, such as a pool slipping down the hill . Mr. <br /> King said he could not make any warranties. Mayor Karp pointed out <br /> that there had been problems behind the hospital where the hill slipped <br /> and the Soils Engineer was responsible because he had a 10-year bond. <br /> In response to questions by Council Member Polvorosa, Mr. King said the <br /> ravine was caused by geotechnical conditions at the time. He said the <br /> runoff from the site currently goes through surface-mounted concrete <br /> ditches, and they propose to add a series of ditches to extend the <br /> drainage system and to control runoff. He said there was no evidence <br /> of a spring in the area: <br /> Council Member Perry asked how the retaining wall helped with the soil . <br /> Mr. King said the retaining walls would be crib walls and would be <br /> covered with vegetation. He said there would be no additional <br /> benching. <br /> Council Member Kerr asked how far the piling would go. Mr. King said <br /> 10 to 15 feet deep, and it would go below the fill area. <br /> Gene DeBolt, Civil Engineer on the project, said his firm has done a <br /> boundary survey and parcel map and improvement plans, which include <br /> drainage, sewer, driveway, etc. He said the driveway ranges from 16 to <br /> 22 feet wide and has been approved by the Fire Department for emergency <br /> access. He said the drainage ditches at the top of each of the walls <br /> will take water down to Montrose Drive. He said the driveway slope <br /> would be 20% maximum. <br /> The Hearing was then opened to the public. <br /> Don Cook, 2155 Edgehill Court, said he was against the project. He <br /> said he understood the Negative Declaration had not been approved and, <br /> therefore, the lot split was moot. <br />