Laserfiche WebLink
.Minutes -.. San Leandro. City.Council Meeting - May 17, 1993 Page - 19 - <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br /> Scott Edwards, 1473 Montrose Drive, said he is against the project. He <br /> said the Initial Study, Part 2, Item 18, asked if the proposal will <br /> result in obstruction to the view; and the answer was "maybe. " He said <br /> he felt it should be "certainly. " He said the Study is not adequate. <br /> He said the City Council should withhold approval of the Negative <br /> Declaration and require a full Environmental Impact Report. He had <br /> asked what. would happen if Mr. Lu and his family did not occupy the <br /> houses themselves and tried to sell them to someone else. He said they <br /> would have to find a lender and they might have difficulty in doing so. <br /> He said the tone of the Soils Report is cautionary. He urged the City <br /> Council to err on the side of caution and to require a full EIR. He <br /> said no interest was shown in this project until the City Council <br /> insisted on a meeting with the neighbors because no one knew about the <br /> project. He said Mr. Lu had been able to buy a sliver of property to <br /> meet the frontage requirements; and, if he had not been able to do so, <br /> he would have had to apply for a Variance, and this would all have come <br /> up in the proper discussions which would have occurred. <br /> Mayor Karp said the matter before the City Council is the lot split, <br /> not the economics of the project or whether Mr. Lu lives in the home or <br /> not. <br /> Mr. Edwards said it was asserted that additional investigations would <br /> be done after the first Negative Declaration, and they were not done. <br /> Council Member Myers asked, if a full EIR were prepared, would there be <br /> any difference between those findings and the Negative Declaration. <br /> Ken Vogeney said, from his perspective, the EIR would list similar <br /> mitigation measures for the same findings. <br /> May Roberts, 1490 Montrose Drive, said her house is immediately below <br /> the property. She said her concern is that someone's house may land on <br /> her house. She asked who would pay. She said she was concerned about <br /> the placement of the driveway, which would be very close to her <br /> property. She said her pool would be about 20 feet away from the <br /> driveway, and she was concerned that, if someone's brakes malfunction, <br /> • <br /> their car would end up in her pool . She said a tremendous amount of <br /> dirt would have to be moved. The slope above her pool is in excess of <br /> 100 feet, and they would have to go down 20 feet to remove dirt. <br /> Mayor Karp pointed out that, if the property owner does not get <br /> approval for the lot split, he would still be able to build a single- <br /> family home without input from the neighbors. Ms. Roberts said <br /> building only on Envelope No. 1 would not require as much cutting. <br />