Minutes 1993 0628 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minutes - Joint San Leandro City Council/ Page - 5 - San Leandro Redevelopment Agency/ Alameda County Board of Supervisors Meeting - June 28, 1993 JOINT PUBLIC HEARING (continued) 3. The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible. 4. The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plans of the City and the County, including, but not limited to, the City's and County's Housing Elements. 5. The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan would promote the public peace, health, safety nd welfare of the community and its environs and would effectuate the purposes and policies of the Community Redevelopment Law. 6. The limited authority for condemnation of real property, as provided for in the Redevelopment Plan, is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan, and adequate provisions have been made for payment for properties to be acquired as provided by Law. 7. The Agency has a feasible method or plan for the relocation of families and persons displaced from the Project Area if the Redevelopment Plan may result in the temporary or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area. 8. There are or are being provided within the Project Area or within other areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities, at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who may be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonable accessible to their places of employment. 9. All non-contiguous areas of the Project Area are either blighted or necessary for effective redevelopment and are not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from such area without other substantial justification for their inclusion. 10. Inclusion of any lands, buildings or improvements which are not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare is necessary for the effective redevelopment of the whole area of which they are a part, and any such area included is necessary for effective redevelopment and is not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from such area without other substantial justification for its inclusion. 11 . The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area could not reasonably be expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without the aid and assistance of the Agency.