My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes 1992 0720
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1992
>
Minutes 1992 0720
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2014 5:07:52 PM
Creation date
1/14/2014 5:07:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minutes
Document Date (6)
7/20/1992
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - July 20, 1992 Page - 8 - <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br /> Mayor Karp asked for an explanation regarding Westfield Corporation and <br /> Westland Corporation. <br /> Mr. Weisbrod said Westfield is the company that owns the Bayfair Mall <br /> and several other shopping centers in the United States. Westland is <br /> the corporation under which Bayfair Mall and this Development Agreement <br /> is being handled. Westland is a subsidiary of Westfield. <br /> Council Member Faria noted that the City Attorney had not signed the <br /> approval on the Development document. He asked if, 15 or 20 years in <br /> the future, a City Council proposes raising the D.F.S. I . fees, are the <br /> D.F.S. I . fees in effect at the time of the development of that property <br /> or building, or are they set at tonight's Council meeting, once the <br /> document is signed? <br /> Steve Meyers, City Attorney, said fees and taxes are not fixed by this <br /> Agreement. He said fees and taxes can change so that the fees in <br /> effect at the time the building permit is pulled are the fees that are <br /> paid by the applicant, irrespective of what those fees are today. He <br /> said that was a hotly negotiated provision of this Agreement, and it <br /> was dealt with by excluding it as one of the approvals that was fixed <br /> by the Agreement. <br /> Council Member Perry asked for an explanation of the C-RM permitted <br /> uses and the City's right to screen, particularly as it relates, for <br /> instance, to a cinema. She said it appears in the Agreement that this <br /> would be a permitted use versus a Conditional Use. She said she <br /> foresees some areas where the City may want to look at hours of <br /> operation, security access, nighttime-oriented activities, etc. , and <br /> may want to impose some controls. <br /> Mr. Weisbrod said the cinemas or theaters themselves would be a <br /> permitted use, subject to review by staff to ensure that they conform <br /> to the Development Agreement and the design guidelines. He said the <br /> family entertainment center would be a Conditional Use, and would be <br /> reviewed differently than the cinemas. <br /> Council Member Perry asked if the review would be only done by staff, <br /> not by Board or Council . Mr. Weisbrod said this was correct. <br /> Council Member Perry noted there was to be a review of the Development <br /> Agreement every 12 months, and said the language is confusing regarding <br /> the non-compliance process, some 30-day kick-ins, if people don't <br /> comply there's a 30-day notice, etc. She asked for explanation of the <br /> process in looking at compliance and non-compliance, and said she was <br /> concerned that a Greenhouse Marketplace situation might develop, where <br /> the City hasn't been able to resolve a lot of issues that have come up. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.