Minutes 1992 0803 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - August 3, 1992 Page - 12 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) Council Member Kerr said he does not normally favor spot zoning, but he feels this is an unusual situation, and this appears to be about the only thing that can be done. He asked what will happen to the site when the new zoning master is prepared and classification changes. Mr. Penaranda said a study of the site will take high priority and, if the zoning changes, the use would again convert to a legal , non-conforming use. The Applicant, Manmohan Chopra, said he agreed with the staff report and would be happy to follow any City regulations. The Hearing was then opened to the public. There being no comments from the public, on motion of Council Member Faria, seconded by Council Member Kerr, and carried unanimously, the Public Hearing was closed. The following Motion was then introduced: Minute Order No. 92-61. On motion by Council Member Faria, who moved its approval , seconded by Council Member Myers, and carried by the following called vote, the City Council approved A-92-01 . (1099) AYES: Council Members Corbett, Faria, Kerr, Myers, Perry, Polvorosa; Mayor Karp ( 7 ) NOES: None ( 0 ) ABSENT: None ( 0 ) D. Matter of PD-92-01, GDP; Planned Unit Development; General Development Plan; to Permit Construction of an 11-Unit, Multiple-Residential Development (Townhouses for Sale as Individual Units) ; 82 Chumalia Street (Northwest Corner of Chumalia and Hyde Streets) ; Assessor's Parcel Numbers 77-446-1-2 and 77-446-2; Plaza 2 Redevelopment Area; Gordon Lu c/o Dahlin Group Architects and Planners; R-7 (Multiple Residential ) District. This being the time and place for the Public Hearing on the above matter, Elmer Penaranda, Assistant Planner, said the subject property consists of two parcels at Hyde and Chumalia. He said the corner parcel is developed with a single-family home and the adjacent parcel is undeveloped. He said the two properties will be combined and developed with two rows of residential buildings consisting of eleven town-home units. Mr. Penaranda described the setbacks, the adjacent Alameda County Flood Control road, and the proposed access gate to the Flood Control area. The Applicant noted the setback was 13 feet from the curb to the building, consisting of a 6-foot sidewalk and a 7-foot setback. Mr. Penaranda described the driveway openings. He said the units would be 2-bedroom, 2-bath units, 980 square feet. He described the exterior elevations and the materials to be used on the buildings.