Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - September 4, 1990 Page - 3 - <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br /> She reviewed the site plan and described the sizes and proposed uses for the <br /> four buildings. She noted that access to the property was limited to two <br /> driveways -- one on Lewelling Boulevard and one on Washington Avenue. She <br /> also displayed floor plans and discussed exterior treatments, building <br /> elevations, signs and landscaping. Ms. Quinn noted that the major issues <br /> were related to street improvements. She said the Applicant is required to <br /> dedicate and improve the property; however, the dedication exceeds that <br /> required by the Zoning Code so the City would be paying for some of the <br /> dedication. The Applicant would be required to dedicate 14% of the property. <br /> She also noted geographics of the property and said the southerly end is <br /> recessed as a result of the adjacent flood-control bridge. She said the <br /> driveways have been located as far away from the intersection as possible. <br /> The City Council asked a number of questions related to vehicular traffic: <br /> they asked how many trucks would be able to stack in the left-turn pocket <br /> on Washington Avenue; how vehicles exiting on Washington Avenue would be able <br /> to get across to the U-turn lane; if semi -trucks would be able to make the <br /> U-turn; what studies had been done to take into account current traffic; and <br /> the impact of this project upon current traffic. <br /> The City Council also asked a number of questions related to the Burger King <br /> proposed for the corner of the site, such as, number of peak-hour trips, <br /> traffic patterns and hours of operation. <br /> Gaye Quinn then reviewed the Conditions of Approval for the project and noted <br /> the City's obligation to construct some of the street improvements, using <br /> DFSI fees. <br /> The City Council asked additional questions related to traffic, the type of <br /> architecture to be used on the project, the impact of the development on the <br /> adjacent apartment complex, and responses to questions in the environmental <br /> documents. <br /> The Hearing was then opened to the public. <br /> David Powell , representing the Applicant, Pacific Development Group, #1 <br /> Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, California, noted the absence of Roy Parker, <br /> the City's Transportation administrator, and of Pacific Development Group's <br /> Traffic Engineer. He said traffic issues are a serious, major concern and <br /> 1 felt it was necessary to have the traffic engineers available to answer City <br /> Council questions. He noted that this matter has been reviewed by Roy Parker <br /> and Pacific Development has been working with him for the better part of a <br /> year. He suggested that the Public Hearing be continued until Mr. Parker <br /> and Pacific Development's Traffic Engineer could be present. At the request <br /> of the City Council , he went on to explain that Pacific Development has been <br /> working with the Neilsen's, the owners of the property, for the last two <br /> r years. He said, although Pacific Development had trouble getting Mr. <br /> Obertello, the owner of the corner property, to sell his property, the <br /> property is now in escrow, so the properties will be combined. He noted this <br /> is a difficult site to develop--it is small , narrow, and has bad access-- <br /> but he feels all of the problems related to traffic, design fees, etc. , have <br /> been answered. He said he felt this would provide a viable commercial center <br /> and eliminate an abandoned site and complete improvements at the <br /> Washington/Lewelling intersection. <br />