My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10C Action 2014 0303
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
Packet 2014 0303
>
10C Action 2014 0303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2019 8:07:13 AM
Creation date
3/5/2014 4:46:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
3/3/2014
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2014 0303 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2014\Packet 2014 0303
Reso 2014-022
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
will be identified. Recommendations will be made for any improvements that <br />would be needed in order to maintain acceptable intersection operation according <br />to the criteria established in the Transportation Element. <br />o. Utilities and Service Systems <br />The Utilities analysis will utilize the findings of the data collection and analysis <br />work in Task 4 to describe and assess potential impacts of the General Plan Update <br />on utility services. This will include a description of existing utility and service <br />systems within the city, including current operations, capacity, and facility locations. <br />Based on the utility and service systems significance criteria, The Planning <br />Center I DC&E will assess potential impacts. If necessary, new or modified <br />General Plan policies will be recommended to reduce impacts to a less -than - <br />significant level. <br />8.5 Alternatives Analysis <br />The Planning Center I DC&E and Kittelson will evaluate up to three alternatives <br />to the proposed project, one of which will be the CEQA-required No Project <br />Alternative. The alternatives will be based in part on the various land use scenarios <br />the City considers as part of the General Plan Update process. According to the <br />CEQA Guidelines, alternatives can be evaluated in less detail than the project; thus, <br />we propose that the alternatives analysis in the EIR be undertaken at a qualitative <br />level. Alternatives can be a key issue of community concern. Therefore, the <br />discussion will be of sufficient detail to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each <br />alternative, and to provide some qualitative conclusions regarding the alternatives. <br />The discussion will include a comparison of potential trip generation for each <br />alternative compared to the preferred Project . It is expected that the two <br />alternatives will primarily be land use variations, but may include some circulation <br />variations. No level of service analysis will be conducted for the two alternative <br />scenarios. Based on this analysis, the Environmentally Superior Alternative will be <br />identified (as required by CEQA). <br />8.6 Document CEQA-Required Assessment Conclusions <br />The Planning Center I DC&E will prepare the appropriate conclusions to fulfill <br />CEQA requirements by providing an assessment of unavoidable significant <br />environmental impacts; significant irreversible environmental changes; relationship <br />between local short-term uses of the environment and long-term productivity; and <br />effects found not to be significant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.