Laserfiche WebLink
41 <br />3. Work Program/Project Schedule <br />Proposal for San Leandro Creek Trail Master Plan <br />Task 3.2 – Final Master Plan and Response to <br />Comments <br />All comments will be clearly documented in a <br />table, stating the comment, and location of <br />the comment in the report and commenter. <br />Revisions to the document will be made or <br />where revisions are not feasible or possible, <br />details explaining why will be provided. This <br />provides an easy to read supplement to the <br />fi nal report and will provide reasoning back to <br />the original commenter if we their desires were <br />unable to be fully met. <br />A fi nal report, incorporating all fi nal revisions, will <br />be prepared in PDF format. Up to fi ve copies <br />are also assumed to be needed. Additional <br />printed copies can also be provided as <br />negotiated. <br />The fi nal document will be a graphically rich <br />document that can be readily understood <br />and appreciated by a wide variety of readers. <br />The document and response table will also be <br />valuable in providing consensus about the fi nal <br />recommendations. <br />Task 4 - Plan Presentation <br />We will prepare a presentation in consultation <br />with the project team for delivery to City <br />Council of both the cities of San Leandro and <br />Oakland. The presentation will summarize <br />the trail master plan, including technical <br />recommendations, and the next steps. We will <br />prepare the PowerPoint presentation that is <br />suitable for this venue, and prepare the draft <br />staff report. These will be submitted to the City <br />staff two weeks prior to the scheduled council <br />meetings. <br />Date Page Agency Comment Response <br />3-9-15 107 (103) Paul, OCTA Figure 7.15 and 7.16: add periods to end of <br />captions <br />Captions are not complete <br />sentences. Punctuation not <br />provided. <br />2-20-15 108 (104) Jeff Dickman, <br />OC Public Works <br />Page 104, in the legend: replace “existing trail” <br />with “existing Class I Bikeway” and “proposed <br />trail” with “proposed Class I Bikeway, Class II <br />Bike Lane or Class IV Cycle Track” <br />Trail changed to bikeway in <br />legend but proposed facility <br />types not diff erentiated <br />(consistency with other fi gures). <br />2-20-15 108 (104) Jeff Dickman, <br />OC Public Works <br />Please add “existing riding and hiking trail” <br />along Fairlynn Boulevard and along Esperanza <br />Road but only within the unincorporated <br />lands; add “proposed riding and hiking trail” <br />along incorporated portion of Esperanza <br />Road, along the Fairmont Connector and <br />Fairmont Boulevard” <br />Added to text and to fi gure. <br />2-20-15 109 (105) Yorba Linda, <br />City of <br />Page 105 Fairmont Connector from Esperanza <br />Road to Fairmont Boulevard: Review Fairmont <br />Connector vehicle volume from 6,000 to 4,000 <br />vehicles per day; revise vehicle volume source <br />from 2008 to 2014 <br />Revised per comments. <br />2-17-15 109 (105)Yorba Linda, <br />City of <br />Page 105 Fairmont Connector from Esperanza <br />Road to Fairmont Boulevard: The parking <br />on Fairmont is used by the residents of the <br />adjacent condominium complex and not the <br />Canyon Hills Friends Church <br />Revised per comments. <br />OC Loop Feasibility Report Agency Responses