My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RDA Reso 2000-009
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2000
>
RDA Reso 2000-009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2016 3:49:11 PM
Creation date
6/3/2016 3:49:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date ā(6)ā
3/6/2000
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
7C New Business 2000 0306
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. 11111 <br /> fp FEHR&PEERS ASSOCIAI lāS,INC. <br /> Transportation Consultants <br /> Ms. Dolores Ortiz <br /> January 14, 2000 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> The trip distribution for the proposed project is based on existing traffic patterns. The trip <br /> distribution and the project trip assignment are presented in Figure 5. <br /> TRAFFIC ANALYSIS <br /> Fehr & Peers Associates analyzed intersection operations at the four study intersections <br /> during both morning and evening peak hours under two different scenarios: Existing <br /> Conditions and Existing Plus Project Conditions. <br /> In order to measure and describe the operation of a local roadway network, traffic engineers <br /> and planners commonly use a grading system called Level of Service (LOS). The LOS <br /> grading system qualitatively characterizes traffic conditions associated with varying levels of <br /> traffic flow. These levels range from LOS A, which indicates free-flow traffic conditions <br /> with little or no delay experienced by motorists, to LOS F, which describes congested <br /> conditions where traffic flows exceed design capacity, resulting in long queues and delays. <br /> Table 2 presents level of service definitions for both signalized and unsignalized <br /> intersections. For this study, the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual methodology for <br /> signalized and unsignalized intersections was used. <br /> Figure 6 illustrates the intersection turning volumes for the Existing Plus Project Conditions. <br /> The service level summaries for both Existing Conditions and Existing Plus Project <br /> Conditions are presented in Table 3. <br /> Under Existing Conditions, the two signalized intersections operate at acceptable LOS C or <br /> better during morning and evening peak hours. Normally, total intersection delay and levels <br /> of services would be presented for the unsignalized intersection, but at the subject <br /> unsignalized ramp intersections, all movements except the left turns are uncontrolled and <br /> experience no delays. The left-turn movements at the unsignalized intersections of Marina <br /> Boulevard with 1-880 on-ramps operate at acceptable LOS D during the AM peak hour, and <br /> not-acceptable LOS F during the PM peak hour. <br /> The addition of traffic from the proposed project results in marginal increases in delays at the <br /> study intersections, however all intersections continue to operate at the same service levels as <br /> without the project. Since the project does not produce any eastbound left-turns at the <br /> Marina Boulevard/I-880 Northbound On-Ramp intersection, there are no significant impacts <br /> at this intersection. The project contributes 21 vehicles to the already failing westbound left- <br /> turn at the Marina Boulevard / I-880 Southbound On-Ramp during the evening peak hour. <br /> This is less than five percent of the existing left-turn volume, and is not considered a <br /> significant impact. 4I3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.