Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 83 <br />b. Documenting Compliance with Maximum Building Height. As part of any ap- <br />plication for View Preservation/Site Plan Review (which is required for any <br />development in the RS-VP sub-district, as per Section 2.04.412 RS-VP Sub- <br />District—Residential Site Plan Review and Exceptions to Height Restrictions), <br />applicants shall illustrate the proposal’s height by providing no less than two <br />sectional views, drawn through the proposed structure and perpendicular to ex- <br />isting contours, one of which shall illustrate the tallest point of the structure (i.e., <br />where the structure would be at its maximum height above “existing grade”), and <br />the other being drawn at approximately the center of the structure. <br /> <br />2. Definition of “Existing Grade.” See 1.12.108 Definitions “Existing Grade” and For <br />the purposes of this subsection, “existing grade” is defined as the surface of the <br />exterior ground as it exists (i.e., without alteration) prior to application for a project <br />regulated by this code (See illustration, “Examples of 18 Foot Height Limit” above). <br /> <br />3. Maximum of One Story. A maximum of one story is permitted in the RS-VP sub- <br />district, except that the improvement of a basement or space below an existing <br />habitable story (i.e., construction of a new habitable story within the building enve- <br />lope of a pre-existing structure) is exempt from this one story limitation. <br /> <br />4. Exceptions. Exceptions may be granted to the 18 feet and/or one-story height limit <br />pursuant to Section 2.04.412 RS-VP Sub-District—Residential Site Plan Review <br />and Exceptions to Height Restrictions. <br /> <br />5. Pre-Existing Structures. Notwithstanding the restrictions specified in Subsection <br />B.3 of Section 4.20.108 Alterations and Expansions on allowed improvements to <br />nonconforming structures, single-family residences in the RS-VP sub-district per- <br />mitted prior to August 15, 2001, and are nonconforming only because they exceed <br />the height limitation of this subsection, may be improved by enlargements or alter- <br />ations of any value. If damaged or destroyed, such structures may be recon- <br />structed as specified by Subsection B.1 of Section 4.20.116 Restoration of a Dam- <br />aged Structure and Its Nonconforming Use (Ord. 2001-015 § 1) <br /> <br />2.04.324 Daylight Planes in R Districts <br /> <br />Daylight Planes are intended to provide for light and air, and to limit the impacts of bulk and <br />mass on adjacent properties. “Daylight Plane” means a height limitation that, when com- <br />bined with the maximum height limit, defines the building envelope within which all new <br />structures or additions must be contained. The daylight plane may further limit the height or <br />horizontal extent of the building at any specific point where the daylight plane is more re- <br />strictive than the height limit applicable at such point on the site. The daylight plane shall be <br />measured separately for each building on a lot, and separately for each side of each build- <br />ing. <br /> <br />City Council Hearing March 2, 2020 121