My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings 2021 0706
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2021
>
Packet 2021 0706
>
5A Public Hearings 2021 0706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2021 8:02:46 PM
Creation date
7/1/2021 7:50:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
7/6/2021
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2021-105 Callan & East 14th Project CUP, Parking and Site Plan
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
24 <br /> <br />by a service population value of 621 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 10.1 MT <br />CO2e/SP/year (see table below).40 <br />SWAPE Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Project Phase <br />Proposed <br />Project (MT <br />CO2e/year) <br />Construction (amortized over 30 years) 27 <br />Area 10 <br />Energy 824 <br />Mobile 5,252 <br />Waste 122 <br />Water 60 <br />Net Annual GHG Emissions 6,295 <br />Service Population 621 <br />Service Population Efficiency 10.1 <br />Threshold 2.6 <br />Exceed? Yes <br />As demonstrated above, the Project’s per capita GHG emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, exceed the <br />AEP’s “2030 Land Use Efficiency Threshold” of 2.6 MT CO2e/SP/year, thus resulting in a potentially <br />significant impact not previously mitigated in the Checklist or General Plan EIR. As such, an updated GHG <br />analysis should be prepared in a full CEQA analysis and additional mitigation should be incorporated <br />accordingly, per CEQA Guidelines. <br />3) Failure to Consider Performance‐based Standards Under CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan <br />As previously discussed, the Checklist relies upon the Project’s consistency with CARB’s 2017 Scoping <br />Plan to determine Project GHG significance (p. 4‐56 – 4‐57). However, this is incorrect, as the Checklist <br />fails to consider performance‐based measures proposed by CARB. <br />i. Passenger & Light Duty VMT Per Capita Benchmarks per SB 375 <br />In reaching the State’s long‐term GHG emission reduction goals, CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan explicitly <br />cites to SB 375 and the VMT reductions anticipated under the implementation of Sustainable <br />Community Strategies.41 CARB has identified the population and daily VMT from passenger autos and <br />light‐duty vehicles at the state and county level for each year between 2010 to 2050 under a “baseline <br />scenario” that includes “current projections of VMT included in the existing Regional Transportation <br />Plans/Sustainable Communities Strategies (RTP/SCSs) adopted by the State’s 18 Metropolitan Planning <br /> <br />40 Calculated: (6,295.0 MT CO2e/year) / (621 service population) = (10.1 MT CO2e/SP/year). <br />41 “California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan.” CARB, November 2017, available at: <br />https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf, p. 25, 98, 101‐103. <br />139
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.