11A Public Hearings - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of San Leandro 2824 Halcyon Drive Residential Project 66 storage tanks (LUST) cleanup sites within 1,000 feet of the site, one approximately 0.1 mile southwest of the site, and one approximately 0.2 mile southwest of the site. Both sites are closed, meaning cleanup activities have occurred in accordance with regulatory standards and no further cleanup action is required at this time (SWRCB 2022). The search did not reveal active LUST cleanup sites in the project vicinity (SWRCB 2022). A search of the EnviroStor database revealed no cleanup sites or permitted facilities within 0.25 mile of the project site (DTSC 2022). Furthermore, the site has not been listed on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment (DTSC 2021; State Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB] 2021). In addition, implementation of General Plan Policies EH-5.1 and EH-5.2 would ensure that hazardous waste and materials are handled appropriately and that residual hazardous wastes on the project site would be remediated before project operation. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e. For a project located in an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The project site is located approximately 2.85 miles north of the Hayward Executive Airport and 4.5 miles east of the Oakland International Airport. The project site is located outside of the Airport Influence Area of both the Hayward Executive Airport and the Oakland International Airport, as shown in Figure 3-1 of the Oakland International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission [ALUC] 2010). As such, the project site is not included in either airport’s Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUC 2010; ALUC 2012). In addition, as discussed in the General Plan EIR, development under the General Plan, which would include the project, would not create land use changes or otherwise affect the airport’s continued operations. Furthermore, General Plan Policies EH-9.3 and EH-9.8 would ensure that changes to airport operations which could affect the ambient noise environment of the project site be monitored and mitigated as feasible. Therefore, the project would not result in a safety hazard or result in people residing or working on the project site experiencing excessive noise. For further discussion on noise, refer to Section 13, Noise and Vibration. The project would have no impact. f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The project may result in partial street closures during construction that could temporarily impede emergency access or evacuation. However, sidewalk or lane closures would need prior approval from the City and would require proper signage and other measures pursuant to SLMC Chapter 5.1 which outlines permits and standards regarding right-of-way encroachment. As stated in the General Plan in Policy CSF-1.5 and discussed under Section 15, Public Services, the City’s Fire and Police Departments would review the project to ensure that sufficient provisions for emergency access and response would be made. These departments’ review would ensure that the proposed project would not impede emergency access. Furthermore, compliance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations and existing plans and policies regarding emergency operations as analyzed in the General Plan EIR would ensure that future development would not interfere with adopted emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.