My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11B Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 06212022
>
11B Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2022 1:20:53 PM
Creation date
6/28/2022 1:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
6/21/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-085 Approving Third Addendum and Planning Entitlements
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-086 2nd amendment to DDA
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM PROJECT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />Page 58 PlaceWorks <br />level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the <br />county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in <br />location that results in substantial safety risks? <br />c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous <br />intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br />d) Result in inadequate emergency access? <br />f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian <br />facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? <br /> <br />Comments: <br />TRAF-a. <br />Circulation and Roadway System <br />The First Addendum found that project modifications would result in fewer traffic trips compared to the <br />Original Project during all time periods, and based on the net reduction in trips, it was likely that the <br />transportation impacts from the modifications will be similar or lower than in the Certified EIR. For the <br />purpose of this Third Addendum, the assumption is that all mitigation measures shall continue to be <br />required of and implemented for the Modified Project. Therefore, with an incremental increase of 6 <br />housing units and a decrease of 1,100 square feet of building area, the Modified Project would not result <br />in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts which would conflict with a <br />program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system or roadway. <br />Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities and Public Transit <br />The Certified EIR for the Original Project, and the First Addendum concluded that impacts to transit, were <br />less than significant, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2C which requires designing <br />roundabouts to accommodate AC Transit buses to would improve transit travel times through the <br />intersections impacted by the approved Project. These findings would also apply for the Modified Project, <br />given the incremental addition of 16 residents to the project area. <br /> <br />The Certified EIR for the Original Project, and the First Addendum concluded that other impacts to transit, <br />roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities were less than significant. These findings would also apply for <br />the Modified Project, which only results in a net increase of 6 housing units and does not further affect <br />transit pathways. and therefore, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2C, the Modified <br />Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts <br />which would conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian <br />facilities. <br /> <br />TRAF-b. <br />The updated 2019 CEQA Guidelines Checklist for Transportation has been amended to include changes to <br />the way that transportation impacts are analyzed pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 743. The amended CEQA <br />Guidelines for Transportation provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating transportation impacts and <br />recommend analysis methodology and thresholds. SB 743 did not change the discretion that lead <br />agencies have to select methodology or define their own significance thresholds; however, the <br />Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has recommended potential metrics to measure
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.