Laserfiche WebLink
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM PROJECT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />Page 58 PlaceWorks <br />level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the <br />county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in <br />location that results in substantial safety risks? <br />c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous <br />intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br />d) Result in inadequate emergency access? <br />f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian <br />facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? <br /> <br />Comments: <br />TRAF-a. <br />Circulation and Roadway System <br />The First Addendum found that project modifications would result in fewer traffic trips compared to the <br />Original Project during all time periods, and based on the net reduction in trips, it was likely that the <br />transportation impacts from the modifications will be similar or lower than in the Certified EIR. For the <br />purpose of this Third Addendum, the assumption is that all mitigation measures shall continue to be <br />required of and implemented for the Modified Project. Therefore, with an incremental increase of 6 <br />housing units and a decrease of 1,100 square feet of building area, the Modified Project would not result <br />in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts which would conflict with a <br />program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system or roadway. <br />Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities and Public Transit <br />The Certified EIR for the Original Project, and the First Addendum concluded that impacts to transit, were <br />less than significant, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2C which requires designing <br />roundabouts to accommodate AC Transit buses to would improve transit travel times through the <br />intersections impacted by the approved Project. These findings would also apply for the Modified Project, <br />given the incremental addition of 16 residents to the project area. <br /> <br />The Certified EIR for the Original Project, and the First Addendum concluded that other impacts to transit, <br />roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities were less than significant. These findings would also apply for <br />the Modified Project, which only results in a net increase of 6 housing units and does not further affect <br />transit pathways. and therefore, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2C, the Modified <br />Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts <br />which would conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian <br />facilities. <br /> <br />TRAF-b. <br />The updated 2019 CEQA Guidelines Checklist for Transportation has been amended to include changes to <br />the way that transportation impacts are analyzed pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 743. The amended CEQA <br />Guidelines for Transportation provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating transportation impacts and <br />recommend analysis methodology and thresholds. SB 743 did not change the discretion that lead <br />agencies have to select methodology or define their own significance thresholds; however, the <br />Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has recommended potential metrics to measure